Search Results for "layout development"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "layout development"

1131 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1131 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Issuance of Occupation Certificate for Committed Development Under UDCPR Regulation 5.1.3. Development Permission Granted Before Draft Regional Plan Publication Protects Builder's Right to Occupation Certificate Despite Subsequent Agricultural Reservation in Regional Plan.

9 Dec 2024

The petitioner, Raj Realtors, a partnership firm, constructed ten buildings comprising 446 residential and 20 commercial units on land at Mouje Pashan...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging TDR Loading and FSI Computation for Redevelopment Project. Court upholds MCGM's permission for TDR and fungible FSI, finding no illegality or public interest violation.

30 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Nitesh Mohanlal Doshi, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the permission gr...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Passes Interim Orders Directing Restoration of Lake and Prevention of Mangrove Destruction in Navi Mumbai. Modification of Development Plan to Permit Golf Course Raised Public Interest Concerns.

1 Nov 2018

The public interest litigations were filed to address the systematic destruction of mangroves and wetlands in Navi Mumbai. The petitioners in PIL 218/...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Demolition Notice for Unauthorised Construction — No Right to Regularise Illegal Construction by Payment of Fees. The Court held that payment of development charges does not condone unauthorised construction under Sections 44 and 53 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

29 Aug 2019

The petitioner, Savitribai Phule Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, challenged a notice dated 9th March 2018 issued by the Solapur Municipal Corporation demand...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

3 Aug 2017

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes RERA Authority's Refund Order Against Builder for Lack of Jurisdiction as Project Was Completed Before RERA Act Came Into Force. The Court held that the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 applies only to ongoing projects where completion certificate is not issued, and since partial occupancy certificate was issued prior to the Act, the complaint was not maintainable and the order was without jurisdiction.

2 Jan 2023

The case arose from a writ petition filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by M/s Provident Housing Limited, a real estate deve...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Section 95A of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 in Cooperative Society Redevelopment Scheme. Petitioners, Tenement Owners, Opposed Redevelopment by Developer Appointed by Majority of Society Members and Sought Quashing of Eviction Order and Declaration that Scheme Is Illegal.

24 Apr 2012

The petitioners, eight members and owners of tenements in Chitranjan Nagar Vidya Cooperative Housing Society Limited, Rajawadi, Ghatkopar (East), Mumb...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Contempt Petition and Writ Petitions in Land Acquisition Dispute — No Willful Disobedience Found. Court held that the acquisition proceedings under the Karnataka Urban Development Authorities Act, 1987 were valid and the petitioner failed to establish contempt.

13 Nov 2025

The case involves a contempt petition (CCC No. 655/2023) filed by Chamundeshwari Nagara Sarvodaya Sangha against Sri Dinesh Kumar, Commissioner of Mys...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Bangalore Development Authority's Appeal in Site Allotment Pricing Dispute, Setting Aside High Court Order. Court Holds Respondents Bound by Terms of 1988 Notification They Consented To, Distinguishing Precedent on Factual Grounds Under Rule 12 of Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment of Sites) Rules, 1984.

9 Mar 2022

The dispute involved site allotments by the Bangalore Development Authority under notifications dated 10.03.1988 and 15.10.1988. Respondents had initi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers State Government's Leave Application for Regularization Policy in PILs. Court Examines Whether Draft Policy Violates MRTP Act and Whether Judicial Review Permits Interference with Policy Decisions.

24 Mar 2017

The proceedings arise from two Public Interest Litigations (PIL No. 80 of 2013 and PIL No. 138 of 2012) before the Bombay High Court. In an earlier or...

30 31 32 33 34

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)