COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 984 of 2018
18 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "composite notification"
378 result(s) found
Found 378 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Rejection of Recognition Application Under MRTU and PULP Act. Industrial Court's finding that the Petitioner-Union failed to establish membership among employees of the successor company PMPML upheld.
22 Mar 2024The Petitioner, Pune Mahanagar Parivahan Mahamandal Karmachari Mahasangh, a trade union, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order date...
- 26
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — No Deceptive Similarity Between STIMULIV and STIMULET for Different Pharmaceutical Products. The court held that the mark 'STIMULET' used for an allopathic breast cancer drug does not infringe the registered mark 'STIMULIV' used for Ayurvedic liver medicines due to differences in nature, trade channels, and customers under Section 29(2) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
20 Jan 2023The case involves a trademark infringement and passing off dispute between two pharmaceutical companies. The appellant, Corona Remedies Private Limite...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Implementation of Government Resolutions for Regularisation of Surplus Vacant Land Under ULC Act — Petitioner Entitled to Benefit of Policy Despite Earlier Exemption Order. Court Directs Respondents to Raise Demand for Premium and Upon Payment, Relieve Petitioner of Exemption Conditions.
30 Mar 2023The petitioners, Salim Alimahomed Porbanderwalla (owner of land CTS Nos. 124 and 125, Village Marol, Andheri, measuring about 17492.70 sq mtrs) and Sh...
- 64
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Thane Municipal Corporation's Abeyance of Buy-Back Policy - Promissory Estoppel Applied. The court held that the Corporation could not resile from its policy after the petitioners acted on it to their detriment under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.
1 Nov 2023The petitioners, Sheth Developers Pvt Ltd and Ashwin Natwarlal Sheth, acquired development rights over land from Voltas Ltd in 2003. In 2016, the Maha...
- 57
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition Challenging Karnataka Micro Loan and Small Loan (Prevention of Coercive Actions) Ordinance, 2025 — Ordinance Held Within State's Legislative Competence. The Ordinance regulating recovery practices in micro and small loans is not ultra vires the Constitution and falls under Entry 30 List III (Money-lending and pawnbrokers).
17 Mar 2025The petitioner, Karnataka Hire Purchase Association, a society registered under the Karnataka Societies Registration Act, 1960, representing motor veh...
- 77
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Suspension of Eating House Licence for Lack of Personal Liability — Licencee Not Vicariously Liable for Acts of Employees Without Prior Knowledge or Consent Under Bombay Police Act, 1951. The court held that the licencee cannot be held vicariously liable for the acts of his employees unless it is shown that the acts were done with his knowledge or consent or that he failed to exercise due diligence.
16 Nov 2011The petitioner, Shri Appu M. Shetty, aged 70 years, is the proprietor of Hotel Sona, an eating house with a permit room located in Goregaon, Mumbai. H...
- 253
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Assessee's Reference in Income Tax Case on Weighted Deduction, Capital Expenditure, and Revenue Receipt. Interest on Export Packing Credit Not Eligible for Section 35B Deduction; Professional Fees for Cement Project Held Capital Expenditure; Settlement Amount from Swiss Company Treated as Revenue Receipt.
5 Sep 2012This judgment by the Bombay High Court pertains to an Income Tax Reference under section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from an appeal by...
- 65
High Court
High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal Against Company Law Board Order in Oppression and Mismanagement Case — Upholds CLB's Discretion to Grant Interim Relief Under Section 402 of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that the CLB has wide powers to pass interim orders to prevent oppression and mismanagement, and such orders are not final determinations of rights.
13 Aug 2013The Union of India, through the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, filed an appeal under Section 10F of the Companies Act, 1956, against an interim order ...
- 174
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Based on Ex-Parte US Default Judgment — Foreign Decree Not a Debt Under Section 433(e) Companies Act, 1956 Without Satisfying Conditions for Enforcement in India.
5 Mar 2014The petitioner, Marine Geotechnics LLC, an American company, obtained an ex-parte default judgment against the respondent, Coastal Marine Construction...
- 109
