Search Results for "agreement holder"

2026 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2026 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Subcontract Dispute. Petition filed by main contractor against subcontractor's award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

Patel Engineering Co. Ltd (PEC) challenged an arbitral award dated 25 January 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Dishonour Case — Conviction and Sentence Upheld. Accused's defence of loan repayment and signature denial rejected due to lack of evidence and admission of signature.

The petitioner, Narasimhan, was convicted under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 by the XXIV Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Monsanto's Petition on Seed Supply as Sale, Allows Subway's Petition on Franchise as Service. Court Holds That Impregnated Seed Supply is Sale of Goods Under Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, While Franchise Agreement is Not a Deemed Sale of Intellectual Property Rights.

The Bombay High Court adjudicated two writ petitions tagged together, raising the common issue of whether certain transactions were liable to service ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines High Court's Dismissal of Objections Under Section 47 CPC in Enforcement of Arbitral Award. Appeal Arises from Long-Term Coal Supply Agreement Dispute Involving Fraud Allegations and Scope of Section 47.

The dispute arose from a Long Term Agreement dated 07.03.2007 between MMTC Limited (appellant) and Anglo American Metallurgical Coal Pvt. Limited (res...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses SLP by Subsequent Purchasers Against High Court Order Directing Possession in Execution of Specific Performance Decree. Executing Court Can Grant Possession Even Without Express Decree for Possession When Property Is in Possession of Contracting Party.

The case involves a dispute arising from a suit for specific performance of a contract for sale of property. The plaintiffs (respondents herein) succe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows TDR Claim for Land Used for Development Plan Road in Pune. Land Not a Public Street Under Section 224 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporations Act, 1949, Hence Society Entitled to Consideration for TDR.

The petitioner, Shri Chhatrapati Rajaram Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., owned land bearing Survey No.682/A at Bibavewadi, Pune. A layout plan was ...