Search Results for "Rule 28(6)"

429 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 429 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Decides Writ Petitions Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications. Petitions Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout by BDA.

A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash the preliminary notification dated 21.05....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners Seek to Quash Preliminary and Final Notifications Issued Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and BDA Act, 1976 for Scheme Area.

The judgment is from the High Court of Karnataka, presided over by Justice Anand Byrareddy, dated 11th July 2014. It pertains to a batch of writ petit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010000842011_1

The matter comprised a batch of writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore, listed under Writ Petition No. 32186 of 2010 and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeal by Subsequent Purchasers Against Decree of Specific Performance of Agreement to Sell. High Court's Ruling That Original Vendees Were Entitled to Specific Performance Despite Contract Termination and Subsequent Sale Is Under Review.

These appeals before the Supreme Court arose from a common judgment of the High Court of Karnataka which allowed two appeals filed by the original ven...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Hears Transfer Petitions in Cheque Dishonour Case Under Section 138 NI Act — Jurisdictional Dispute Between Kolkata and Bhopal Courts. Court Examines Pre and Post Amendment Legal Principles to Determine Proper Forum for Trial.

The Supreme Court addressed transfer petitions filed by the accused company seeking transfer of a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instru...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Authorities in Madras Urban Land Tax Act — Act Held Constitutionally Valid. Levy of 0.4% on Market Value of Urban Land Under Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966 Not Violative of Articles 14 and 19(1)(f), and Retrospective Operation Reasonable.

The case concerned the constitutional validity of the Madras Urban Land Tax Act, 1966, which levied a tax on urban land at 0.4% of its market value. T...