Search Results for "Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888"

407 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 407 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals Against High Court Order Protecting Open Spaces in JVPD Scheme. Layout Reservation of 1967 Prevails Over Development Plan of 1999 Under DCR.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals against the Bombay High Court judgment that declared two plots in JVPD Scheme, Mumbai, as mandatory open spaces an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Order of Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal in Recovery Proceedings. The Case Involves Settlement and Auction of Property of Bradbury Mills Ltd., a Company in Liquidation, with Multiple Creditors and Guarantors.

The writ petition was filed by Everest Fincap Pvt. Ltd. challenging an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 22 August 2008, whic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Order in Redevelopment Dispute — Upholds Developer's Right to Fair Hearing. Section 95A of MHADA Act, 1976 Requires Compliance with Natural Justice Before Revoking Development Rights.

The petitioners, M/s Darshan Jayant Builders (a partnership firm) and its partner Pritesh M. Jain, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Cons...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against BMC's Alternate Accommodation Offer in Beautification Project. Court upholds BMC's policy requiring deposit of 6 months stallage charges and self-construction of stalls by project affected persons.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, were occupants of commercial structures on land belonging to the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (BMC) fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Appeal Seeking Injunction Against Demolition — Tenant Refusing to Vacate Despite Offer of Market Compensation. Court Held That Tenant Cannot Hold Development to Ransom and Must Accept Compensation or Face Eviction.

The appellant, Smt. Esther Manickam, was a tenant in Flat No.A2, Ground floor, Ruia Building, Juhu, Mumbai, paying rent less than Rs.50 per month. The...