Search Results for "Civil Registrar"

4081 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4081 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Against Sub-Registrar in Forgery Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. Petitioner's Role as Registering Authority Not Sufficient to Attract Sections 420, 465, 468, 471 IPC Without Evidence of Intent or Knowledge.

The petitioner, Bhuvaneshwar S/o Laxman Masamatti, was working as a Sub-Registrar at Jamakhandi. He was arrayed as accused No.6 in Crime No.24/2020 re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Petitioner's Trade Mark for Non-Compliance with Mandatory Notice Requirement Under Section 25(3) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Removal of Trade Mark 'CIPLA' Held Void as Registrar Failed to Send O-3 Notice to Registered Proprietor, Contravening Statutory Mandate.

The petitioner, Cipla Limited, sought a writ of certiorari to quash the removal of its registered trade mark 'CIPLA' from the register and a mandamus ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal in Trust Dispute — Upholds Single Judge's Order Dismissing Petitions for Lack of Proper Authorization. Trust Failed to Produce Resolution Authorizing Filing of Writ Petitions, Resulting in Dismissal.

The case involves a dispute over the management of Paschim Vibhag Shikshana Mandal, a trust registered under the Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950, and al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order Under Section 79AA of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Court upholds order directing bank to extend interest subvention scheme to cooperative spinning mill, finding no error in the concurrent decisions of the authorities.

The petitioner, Kolhapur District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd., challenged the judgment and order dated 13th July 2018 passed by the State of Maharas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Opposition Case — Registration of Device Mark Set Aside Due to Lack of Evidence of Use. The Court held that the Registrar erred in accepting user claim without proper documentary evidence, and that the appellant's prior use since 1992 was established.

The appellant, Ganesh Consumer Products Ltd., filed an appeal under Section 91 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999, against an order dated 11.09.2024 passed ...