Search Results for "Bombay Police Act 1951"

669 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 669 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reservation Policy for Principal Posts in Aided Colleges. Post of Principal is an Isolated Post Not Subject to Reservation Under Maharashtra Reservation Policy.

The petitioner, Marathwada Legal and General Education Society, runs two aided colleges: Manikchand Pahade Law College (established 1956) and Dr. (Smt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Accused in NIA Case for Failure to File Chargesheet Within 90 Days. Section 21(4) of NIA Act, 2008 read with Section 167(2) CrPC mandates release on bail if investigation not completed within statutory period.

The appellant, Gautam P. Navlakha, was arrested on 14.04.2020 in connection with FIR No. RC 01/2020/NIA/Mum registered by the National Investigating A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Against Petitioner Due to Absence of Live Link Between Offences and Externment Order. Externment Under Section 56(1)(b) Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Set Aside as No Criminal Activity for 16-18 Months Before Show-Cause Notice.

The Bombay High Court at Nagpur heard a criminal writ petition challenging an externment order passed against the petitioner under Section 56(1)(b) of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Entertainment License for Obscene Acts and Licensee Absence. Licensee's failure to supervise and presence of unauthorized persons running establishment justified cancellation under Bombay Police Act, 1951 and Rules.

The petitioner, M/s. Hotel Suraj, operated an eating house with licenses for orchestra, liquor service under the Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949, and an ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes MPDA Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Prejudice to Public Order. The court held that the detaining authority failed to properly consider the material and the alleged activities did not affect public order.

The petitioner, Chandrashekhar @ Chandya s/o Devrao Paikrao, challenged a detention order dated 01.07.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Nanded u...