Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reservation Policy for Principal Posts in Aided Colleges. Post of Principal is an Isolated Post Not Subject to Reservation Under Maharashtra Reservation Policy.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: AURANGABAD In Favour of Accused
  • 91
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Marathwada Legal and General Education Society, runs two aided colleges: Manikchand Pahade Law College (established 1956) and Dr. (Smt.) Indirabai Bhaskarrao Pathak Mahila Arts, Commerce and Science College (established 1971). The petitioner challenged communications dated 11.03.2022, 04.05.2022, 24.06.2022, and 14.09.2022 issued by respondent Nos. 1, 2, and 5, which insisted that the petitioner get the roster verified from the competent authority and treated the posts of Principal of these two colleges as amenable to the policy of reservation. The petitioner's claim that the post of Principal is an isolated post and reservation policy is not applicable was rejected impliedly by the respondents. The court considered the issue of whether the post of Principal in an aided college is an isolated post not subject to reservation. The court held that the post of Principal is a single post in the cadre and cannot be included in the roster for reservation. The communications insisting on roster verification and treating the post as reserved were quashed. The court allowed the writ petition and set aside the impugned communications.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Reservation - Isolated Post - Post of Principal in aided college is an isolated post and not subject to reservation policy - The court held that the post of Principal is a single post in the cadre and cannot be included in the roster for reservation - The communications insisting on roster verification and treating the post as reserved were quashed (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the post of Principal in an aided college is an isolated post not subject to reservation policy, and whether the communications insisting on roster verification and treating the post as amenable to reservation are valid.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition allowed. Impugned communications quashed.

Law Points

  • Isolated post
  • reservation policy
  • principal post
  • aided college
  • Maharashtra Reservation Policy
  • roster verification
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (BOM) (08) 10

Writ Petition No. 3108 of 2023

2023-08-07

Mangesh S. Patil, Shailesh P. Brahme

2023:BHC-AUG:16737-DB

Ajay S. Deshpande for Petitioner, S. S. Thombre for Respondent No. 1, S. G. Sangle A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 2 to 5

Marathwada Legal and General Education Society, Aurangabad Through its Secretary Dr. Smt. Kalpalata Patil Bharaswadkar

Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurangabad; The State of Maharashtra; The Director of Higher Education; The Joint Director of Higher Education; Assistant Commissioner, B. C. Cell

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging communications insisting on roster verification and treating principal posts as subject to reservation.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of communications dated 11.03.2022, 04.05.2022, 24.06.2022, and 14.09.2022.

Filing Reason

Respondents insisted on roster verification and treated principal posts as amenable to reservation policy.

Issues

Whether the post of Principal in an aided college is an isolated post not subject to reservation policy.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that principal is an isolated post and reservation policy is not applicable.

Ratio Decidendi

The post of Principal is a single post in the cadre and cannot be included in the roster for reservation; it is an isolated post not subject to reservation policy.

Judgment Excerpts

The claim of the petitioner that principal is an isolated post and reservation policy is not applicable stands rejected, impliedly.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Kidnapping and Attempt to Murder Case Due to Compromise Between Parties. Court holds that when the victim and complainant have settled the dispute and no public interest is involved, continuation of proceedings would ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Applicants in Kidnapping and Theft Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Mere Presence Without Overt Act or Common Intention Does Not Sustain Charges Under Sections 363, 380, 34 IPC.