Search Results for "1894"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "1894"

1746 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1746 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Compensation for Land Acquired in 1983 Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioner's claim for compensation after 36 years held barred by delay and laches as no explanation for inaction was provided.

18 Jan 2023

The petitioner, Kiritkumar B. Shah, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the resp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Special Land Acquisition Officer to Determine Compensation for Land Acquired for Agricultural Produce Market Committee Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 — Compromise Terms Binding on Parties. The court held that the SLAO must pass a fresh award as per the compromise recorded in Writ Petition No. 2285 of 1992, failing which the petitioners could seek additional compensation in civil court.

19 Aug 2023

The petitioners, Radhabai wd/o Purushottam Mallawat and Ashish s/o Purushottam Mallawat, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Rejection of Section 28-A Application for Violation of Natural Justice in Land Acquisition Matter. Failure to Issue Notice and Grant Hearing Before Rejecting Redetermination Application Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Renders Order Void.

8 Aug 2023

The petitioners, whose lands were acquired for irrigation purposes, filed an application under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 seeking ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landowners' Challenge to Acquisition for Industrial Development — Petitioners Failed to Prove Lapse Under Section 24(2) of LARR Act, 2013. Compensation Tendered and Possession Taken by MIDC, Acquisition Did Not Lapse.

23 Dec 2022

The petitioners, Ramesh Bapurao Nikhade and Dilipkumar Bapurao Nikhade, along with the legal representatives of Bapurao Dasruji Nikhade, filed writ pe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Lapse and Subsequent Possession Under Section 24(2) of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 — Held that Once Acquisition Lapses, Possession Cannot Be Retained Without Fresh Proceedings.

9 Dec 2021

The petitioners, owners of agricultural lands in Golatgaon, Aurangabad, challenged the acquisition of their lands under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Land Acquisition Reference Matter — Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Application Under Section 18(3)(b) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The Court held that the Land Acquisition Officer must forward the reference application to the civil court if the applicant is entitled to seek reference under Section 18(1) of the Act.

19 Sep 2025

The petitioners, Sri Shrikant S/o Bhavu Desai and Smt. Hira W/o Bhavu Desai, filed a Civil Revision Petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Pr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Appeal Seeking Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Burden of Proof Not Discharged. Appellant failed to prove inadequacy of compensation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as evidence of comparable sales was not properly established.

10 Jun 2010

The case pertains to an appeal filed by Benjamin Pereira against the judgment and award dated 17th November 2006 passed by the Learned District Judge,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 28A Limitation in Land Acquisition Act — Three-Month Period for Redetermination of Compensation Held Constitutional. The court ruled that the three-month limitation under Section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 is reasonable and does not violate Article 14 of the Constitution, as the classification between award acceptors and Section 18 reference seekers is valid.

24 Jul 2012

The petitioner, Surendrakumar Madhusudan Mor, owned land bearing Gat No.128 admeasuring 5.27 hectares at mouza Pimpri (Hatgaon), Taluka and District Y...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Declaration Under MRTP Act — Developer Without Locus Standi as Development Agreement Was After Purchase Notice. The court held that a developer who acquires interest after a purchase notice under Section 127 of the MRTP Act cannot challenge the subsequent acquisition declaration under Section 126(4) read with Section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

14 Feb 2006

The petitioner, a partnership firm of builders and developers, challenged a declaration issued by the Government of Maharashtra under Section 126(4) o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reservation on Land Due to Mapping Error and Non-Acquisition. The court quashed the reservation on the petitioner's land as the reservation chart showed a different survey number and no acquisition steps were taken for decades.

16 Jan 2014

The petitioner, an agriculturist aged 77, is a joint owner of agricultural land Gat No. 933 (Old Survey No. 212/1) admeasuring 15R. In 1981, responden...

30 31 32 33 34

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)