WRIT PETITION NO.8952 OF 2009
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "selection challenge"
1688 result(s) found
Found 1688 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Age Limit Reduction for In-Service Candidates in Delhi Police Sub-Inspector Recruitment. Amendment to Rule 7 and Rule 27A of Delhi Police (Appointment & Recruitment) Rules, 1980 reducing upper age limit from 40 to 30 years for general candidates held not arbitrary or violative of Articles 14 and 16.
1 Jan 2020The case pertains to a challenge by Constables/Head Constables (Male) serving in Delhi Police against the amendment to Rule 7 and Rule 27A of the Delh...
- 159
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appointment of Deputy City Engineer (Electrical) for Violation of Recruitment Rules. Appointment by Direct Recruitment Instead of Promotion from Internal Candidates Set Aside, Direction to Consider Eligible Petitioner for Promotion.
23 Aug 2005The petitioners, employees of Pune Municipal Corporation working as Assistant City Engineers (Electrical), challenged the appointment of respondent no...
- 116
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Teacher Selection in Private Aided School — No Violation of Selection Process Found. Court held that the selection committee's composition complied with the Maharashtra Employees of Private Schools (Conditions of Service) Regulation Act, 1977 and Rules, and the petitioner failed to establish any illegality or mala fides.
7 Mar 2005The petitioner, Vilas Adhikrao Survase, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the selection and appointment...
- 119
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Quashing of Select List for Fireman Grade-I Posts Due to Non-Compliance with Reservation Rules. Selection process vitiated by failure to follow roster points for OBC and SC candidates, violating Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.
16 Feb 2005The case involves two writ petitions challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) which quashed the select list for the posts of...
- 108
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Cantonment Board Promotion Dispute, Reinstating Appellant's Promotion Based on Seniority from Higher Pay Scale. Promotion to Office Superintendent Under Cantonment Fund Servant Rules, 1937 Upheld as Appellant's Seniority in Feeder Cadre Determined by Higher Pay Scale, Not Date of Appointment.
2 Mar 2022The dispute arose from a promotion conflict within the Cantonment Board, Ranikhet, involving the appellant and the respondent, both employees vying fo...
- 353
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Banks' Appeals in Agricultural Field Officer Recruitment Dispute — Equivalence of Qualification Cannot Be Determined by Courts. Corrigendum Issued After Recruitment Notification Cannot Be Applied Retrospectively to Benefit Candidates Who Did Not Possess Prescribed Qualification.
8 Aug 2019The Supreme Court of India heard two civil appeals arising from a common judgment of the Kerala High Court concerning the recruitment of Agricultural ...
- 187
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Graduate Anganwadi Workers in ICDS Supervisor Recruitment Under 29% Quota, Reversing High Court's Exclusion Interpretation. Rule Amendment Interpreted as Allocating 11% from Open Recruitment for Graduates Without Affecting Eligibility of SSLC Holders with 10 Years' Experience Under Special Rules for Kerala Social Welfare Subordinate Services, 2010.
16 Mar 2026The dispute arose from the recruitment of Supervisors in the Integrated Child Development Scheme (ICDS) under the Kerala Social Welfare Subordinate Se...
- 326
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Grievance Committee Order and Directs Counting of Service from Initial Appointment for Lecturer’s Senior Scale. The Court held that the regular appointment date of 02.07.1988, as determined by the College Tribunal, governs subsequent pay scale benefits under Statute No. 1 of 1989, not a later date based on management’s artificial selection.
4 Apr 2018The petitioner, a lecturer at Babasaheb Naik College of Engineering, Pusad, sought to count his service from 02.07.1988 for the purpose of senior scal...
- 25
High Court
High Court at Bombay Considers Challenge to Revised Guidelines for Grant of Offshore Exploration Licence. Petitioner Argues Notification Violates Section 35 of Offshore Areas Mineral (Development and Regulation) Act, 2002 and Article 14.
17 Sep 2013The writ petition was filed by Rare(H) Minerals Private Limited, a company engaged in prospecting and exploration, challenging the Notification (Revis...
- 12
