Search Results for "bonus claim"

361 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 361 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows PIL Against APMC for Illegal Construction Without Development Permission Under MRTP Act. Agricultural Produce Marketing Committee Not a Local Authority Under Section 2(15) of MRTP Act, Hence Not Exempt from Section 44.

This Public Interest Litigation was filed by Goroba Pandurang Gadekar against the State of Maharashtra, Latur Municipal Corporation, Agricultural Prod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Reduction of Superannuation Age from 60 to 58 for Employees of Government Mining Corporation. State as Sole Shareholder Can Amend Service Rules Unilaterally Without Employee Consent.

The petitioners, employees of Maharashtra State Mining Corporation Ltd. (a Government company), challenged the State Government's decision to reduce t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Recovery of Erroneous Incentive Increments. Secondary Grade Teacher Not Entitled to Incentive Increment for M.A. (Economics) as Qualification Lacked Nexus with Teaching Duties Under GO.Ms.No.324.

The writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by a Secondary Grade Teacher seeking to quash orders issued by educational ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR Against Company and Directors in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Lack of CBI Jurisdiction. Registration of FIR Without Involvement of Public Servant and Based on RBI Master Circular Held Without Authority, and Section 120B IPC Cannot Apply Standalone.

The case involved Associate Lumbers Private Limited and its directors, who had availed loan facilities from Corporation Bank (later Union Bank of Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Injunction Order in Pledge Dispute, Upholds Ad-Interim Relief Despite Delay in Pronouncement. Delay of Over One Year in Passing Interlocutory Order Does Not Automatically Vitiate It Unless Prejudice Is Demonstrated.

The case involves three commercial appeals filed under Section 13(1-A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, challenging an order dated 5 June 2023 pass...