Search Results for "appellate interference"

7705 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7705 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Railway Board's Catering Licensing Policy — License Fee and Gross Sales Share Not Arbitrary. The policy requiring licensees to pay a share of gross sales is a valid contractual term and does not violate Article 14 or Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, various catering associations and individual licensees, challenged the Railway Board's policy dated 1st April 2013 and subsequent cir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Writ Appeal Against Single Judge's Dismissal of Petition on Extension of Tenure of Raichur Municipal Councillors. Appeal Focuses on Interpretation of Section 503 of Karnataka Municipal Corporation Act and Exclusion of Administrator Period from Five-Year Term.

The writ appeal arose from the dismissal of W.P.No.202910/2025 by the learned Single Judge of the High Court of Karnataka, which had been filed by 23 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Revision Against Eviction Decree for Arrears of Rent, Damage, and Unauthorized Construction Under Bombay Rent Act, 1947. Doctrine of Relation Back Not Applicable as Amendment Was Not Allowed to Relate Back to Original Filing Date.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by tenants (Anil Joginder Sachdev and Rajeev Joginder Sachdev) against a decree of eviction passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Eviction Suit — Landlord Failed to Prove Bona Fide Need for Residential Premises Under Section 16 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Tenant's Use of Rear Rooms for Storage and Occasional Stay Did Not Constitute Subletting or Change of User.

The petitioner, a tenant, challenged the judgment and order dated 11th August 1999 passed by the Additional District Judge, Thane, which partly decree...