Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Matter — Assessment of Compensation and Allied Issues. Dispute Involves Quantum of Compensation and Locus Standi of Acquiring Body Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.
1 Jan 2026...
Search Results for "additional forum"
2072 result(s) found
Found 2072 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Caste Validity Certificates — Employer Lacks Locus Standi Under Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2000. Corporation Cannot Challenge Certificates Issued to Employees as Only Person Aggrieved or State Government Can Do So.
20 Aug 2024The Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the caste validity certificates issue...
- 359
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows HUDA's Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Section 5A Compliance Upheld. Collector's recommendation not binding on State Government; no discrimination found in acquisition of land for development.
18 Oct 2024The case involves appeals by Haryana Urban Development Authority (HUDA) against the High Court's judgment quashing land acquisition notifications unde...
- 825
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Arrest Order Against Guarantors in DRT Recovery Proceedings — Recovery Officer Cannot Order Arrest Without Prior Notice and Hearing Under Section 25 of RDDBFI Act, 1993
27 Feb 2023The petitioners, Kishor K. Mehta and Rajesh K. Mehta, were directors and guarantors of Beautiful Diamonds Company Limited, which had availed loan faci...
- 61
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Premature Retirement of Deputy Director of Health Services. The court upheld the constitutional validity of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 and found the premature retirement order valid based on adverse entries and public interest.
21 Oct 2011The petitioner, Dr. Mrs. Pratibha Gulhane, a retired Deputy Director of Health Services, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Const...
- 88
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Developer Removal in Slum Rehabilitation Case Due to Bias — Participation of CEO in Appellate Committee Violates Natural Justice. CEO who passed initial removal order cannot sit as member of High Power Committee hearing appeal against his own order under Slum Rehabilitation Authority regulations.
14 Aug 2012The petitioner, Susme Builders Private Limited, a developer, was selected by the respondent Co-operative Society in 1986 for redevelopment of its prop...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Husband and In-Laws in Domestic Violence Case — No Prima Facie Case of Cruelty or Dowry Demand Established. Allegations of Demand for Car and Cash Found Vague and Unsupported by Evidence Under Sections 498-A IPC and 3, 4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, 1961.
11 Apr 2018The petitioners, Dr. Saurabh Velukar (husband), his mother Adv. Surekha Yelurkar, and father Dr. Shivhar Yelurkar, filed a writ petition under Article...
- 69
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging ECIR for Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction — Offence of Money Laundering Found to Be Intertwined with Predicate Offence Registered in Karnataka. ECIR Registration by Bangalore Zonal Office Upheld as Territorial Jurisdiction Derives from Location of Scheduled Offence Under Sections 3 and 2(1)(p) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002.
16 Feb 2023The petitioners, accused in Crime No.23 of 2018 registered at Ashoknagar Police Station, Hubballi, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of...
- 24
High Court
Bombay High Court Clarifies Maintainability of Revision Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 — Interlocutory Procedural Orders Not Revisable. Division Bench Holds That Revision Under Section 34(4) is Limited to Orders Affecting Rights or Liabilities of Parties and Does Not Extend to Purely Procedural Orders Passed Under CPC.
21 Jan 2013The Bombay High Court was seized of three writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution challenging orders passed by the Court of Small Causes ...
- 23
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes PMLA Proceedings Against Accused in Seva Bank Loan Fraud Case — Lack of Scheduled Offence and Non-Application of Mind in ECIR Registration. The court held that the ECIR was registered solely on the basis of FIR No.163/2018 involving Section 420 IPC, but the subsequent FIRs (525/2021, 526/2021, 527/2021) which included other scheduled offences were not considered, and the proceeds of crime were not properly identified, rendering the PMLA proceedings unsustainable.
29 Aug 2024The judgment concerns multiple writ petitions filed by individuals accused in connection with alleged loan fraud involving Seva Vikas Co-operative Ban...
- 471
