Search Results for "acquiring bank"

583 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 583 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Due to Reliance on Post-Notification Sale Deed. Reference Court's award set aside as sale deed dated after Section 4 notification was not a valid comparable instance under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellant, Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation (VIDC), filed an appeal against the judgment of the reference Court in LAC No. 660 of 2007,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Share Dispute Due to Civil Nature. Dispute over share purchase agreement held to be purely contractual, not constituting criminal breach of trust or cheating under Sections 406, 420, 120B IPC.

The petitioners, Rohan Dukle and Sudhir Gudal, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Cri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in Land Dispute Case — Concurrent Findings Set Aside Due to Non-Application of Mind by First Appellate Court. The Court Held That the First Appellate Court Must Comply with Order 41 Rule 31 CPC and Decide the Appeal on Merits After Proper Appreciation of Evidence.

The present second appeals arise from a land dispute between the appellants (original plaintiffs) and the respondents (original defendants) concerning...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Revision Against Succession Certificate Granted to Widow and Children in Summary Proceeding Under Indian Succession Act. Concurrent findings of fact on validity of marriage cannot be interfered with under Section 115 CPC in absence of jurisdictional error or perversity.

The present Civil Revision Application under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 read with Section 384(1)(3) of the Indian Succession Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Land Acquisition for Private Companies Due to Lack of Public Purpose and Favoritism. State's Exercise of Eminent Domain Found to be Misused for Allocating Valuable Land to Private Entities Without Legitimate Industrial Development Goals.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a writ appeal challenging a single judge's order dated 06.03.2013 in W.P.No.17211/2009. The appeal was ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes FIR Against Accused in Unlawful Assembly Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations and Communal Harmony. Sections 143, 147, 148, 153A, 504, 506, 149 IPC Not Attracted as Incident Was a Spontaneous Altercation Without Common Object or Communal Motive.

The petitioners, five individuals, filed a criminal petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of FIR ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Auction Notice Issued by Town Panchayat for Lack of Authority Under Karnataka Municipalities Act, 1964. Town Panchayat Cannot Auction Property Without Statutory Power and Without Following Due Process Under Section 70 of the Act.

The petitioners, who are residents and property owners in Arkalgud Town, challenged an auction notice dated 20.09.2021 issued by the Arkalgud Town Pan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Acquiring Body's Appeal in Land Acquisition Compensation Case Due to Lack of Evidence for Enhanced Market Value. Claimants Failed to Prove Market Value Through Comparable Sales or Reliable Expert Evidence, Resulting in Restoration of Original Compensation.

The appeal was filed by the Vidarbha Irrigation Development Corporation under Section 54 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, challenging the enhancemen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case, Enhances Compensation for Land Acquired for Road Construction. The court enhanced compensation from ₹52/- to ₹200/- per sq.mt. under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, considering location and amenities.

The appellant, Jacinto Baretto Miranda, owned land in Margao, Goa, which was acquired by the government for road construction. Possession was taken in...