Search Results for "Section 217"

984 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 984 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court heard challenge to deemed conveyance order under MOFA; developer alleged res judicata due to consent decree. Developer contended that Competent Authority lacked jurisdiction under Section 11(3) when consent decree already provided for conveyance.

The writ petition was filed by developers challenging an order of deemed conveyance passed by the Competent Authority under Section 11(3) of the Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by MIDC in Contract Breach Case — No Binding Contract Without Work Order. Mere acceptance of tender does not create contractual obligations; formal work order essential under tender conditions.

The case involves an appeal by the Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) against a decree passed in Special Civil Suit No.99/2009, whe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of SARFAESI Act Auction Sale Where Title Derived from Alleged Forged Documents. Court Considers Whether Auction Purchaser is Entitled to Refund of Sale Consideration on Ground of Fraud.

The writ petition was filed by M/s Paramount Constructions Company challenging the sale certificate dated 10.10.2014 issued by the Authorised Officer ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Acquits Accused under Section 498A IPC; General Allegations of Suspicion and Ill-Treatment Do Not Constitute Cruelty. Convictions Under Section 498A Set Aside, While Appeals Against Conviction Under Section 302 to be Decided on Remaining Grounds.

The appellants, accused No.1 and accused No.2, were convicted by the trial court for the offence punishable under Section 498A read with Section 34 IP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.

The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL CONFIRMATION CASE NO. 02 OF 2024

The case stems from Crime No. 634 of 2022 registered at Kalamna Police Station for multiple offences including murder (Section 302 IPC), attempted mur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Discharge in PMLA Case — Money Laundering Held to be Continuing Offence. Retrospective Application of PMLA Upheld Where Proceeds of Crime Remain in Circulation, Irrespective of When Scheduled Offence Was Committed.

The appellant, Pradeep Nirankarnath Sharma, was implicated in a money laundering case under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) based ...