Search Results for "Finance Act 2021 Amendment"

408 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 408 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State's Appeal for Condonation of 837-Day Delay Due to Lack of Plausible Explanation — Administrative Apathy Not Sufficient Ground for Condonation Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The State of Gujarat and another (the applicants) filed a Civil Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, seeking condonation of 837 da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Internal Audit Objection Constitutes Change of Opinion. Notice Issued Beyond Three Years Based on Audit Objection Without Fresh Material Held Invalid as It Amounts to Mere Change of Opinion.

The petitioner, Shri Dilip Laximan Powar, a paralyzed individual represented by his wife, runs a hardware and paint retail business as a proprietorshi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes ITAT's Rectification Order in Income Tax Case — Tribunal Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 254(2) by Reviewing Its Own Decision. Mistake Apparent from Record Must Be Obvious and Not Require Re-appreciation of Evidence.

The petitioner, M/s. I.G. Petrochemicals Ltd., an assessee under the Income Tax Act, 1961, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 05.09.202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Exclusion of Unaided Private School Students from National Means cum Merit Scholarship Scheme. Classification Between Government/Aided/Local Body Schools and Unaided Private Schools Held Reasonable and Not Violative of Article 14.

The petitioner, Sri Sri Ravishankar Vidya Mandir, a recognized unaided private school in Osmanabad, challenged the validity of Note I of clause 3(d) o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity of Time Limit for Availing Input Tax Credit Under Section 16(4) of CGST Act. The court held that the time limit is mandatory and not directory, and retrospective amendments are valid.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions, addressed the constitutional validity and interpretation of Section 16(4) of the Central Goods an...