Search Results for "unilateral transactions"

84 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 84 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Arbitration Dispute — No Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Held That the Arbitral Award Was Not in Conflict with Public Policy and Did Not Suffer from Patent Illegality.

The petitioner, Hi Style India Pvt. Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an Arbitral A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Legal Analysis of Dishonored Cheques Case. Delve into the intricacies of evidence, witness testimonies, and contractual obligations in a high-stakes legal battle over dishonored cheques under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

The case revolves around the issuance of cheques by Ambitious Marketing to Kores (India) Ltd. for goods received but not honored due to "payment stopp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court: Promotional Trailers Do Not Create Contractual Obligations; No Deficiency in Service or Unfair Trade Practice. Creative Freedom in Art Protects Film Producers from Consumer Claims Regarding Missing Promotional Content.

The Supreme Court addressed whether a promotional trailer creates a contractual obligation or leads to an unfair trade practice under the Consumer Pro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Blacklisting of Supplier by Central Bank of India for Non-Supply Due to Force Majeure. Natural Calamity in Thailand Constitutes Force Majeure Excusing Performance Under Contract Law Principles.

The petitioner, M/s. Acer India (Pvt.) Ltd., a private limited company engaged in supplying computer software and hardware, challenged its blacklistin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 34 Petition and Sets Aside Ex Parte Arbitral Award for Lack of Proper Notice. Arbitrator Directed to Give Fresh Notice to All Parties Before Proceeding.

The petitioners, Mrs. Prajakta Mahesh Joshi and Mr. Mahesh Shrikrishna Joshi, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Broker's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Client Dispute Over Delay Paying Charges. Unilateral Charging of 2% Daily Interest Without Specific Agreement or Proof of Loss Held Unconscionable and Not Enforceable Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The case involves a dispute between Sharekhan Limited, a trading member/broker of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE), and Nita Thakkar, a client. The bro...