Search Results for "tribal land restoration"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "tribal land restoration"

45 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 45 result(s)

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Public Interest Litigation Against Tree-Planting Fund Collection — Cauvery Calling Project Not Found to Be Collecting Funds Illegally or Without Government Oversight. Court Finds No Illegal Fund Collection or Activity on Government Land, Holds State Already Monitoring the Project.

7 Sep 2021

The present writ petition was filed as a public interest litigation under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, by a practicing advocate,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MRT Order Setting Aside Eviction Under Section 59 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966. The MRT lacked jurisdiction to entertain an appeal against a Tahsildar's eviction order passed under Section 59 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966, and the appeal was barred by limitation.

3 Feb 2020

The petitioners, original tenants of the disputed land, challenged the decision of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (MRT) dated 26.04.1996, which allo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Aarey Colony Development as Forest Land — Held That Aarey Colony Is Not a Forest Under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980, and That the State Government Has Discretion to Use Land for Public Purposes. The court ruled that the dictionary meaning of 'forest' does not apply to Aarey Colony, and the petitioners failed to establish that it is a forest requiring prior approval under Section 2 of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

4 Oct 2019

The petitioners, Vanashakti (a public trust) and four individuals, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India b...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petitions Challenging Distinction Between Gowari and Gond Gowari; Upholds Affinity Test and Inclusion in OBC List. Supreme Court Precedent in Milind and Mana Cases Applied to Hold That Only Gond Gowari Is Scheduled Tribe and Court Cannot Amend Presidential Order Under Article 342 of the Constitution.

14 Aug 2018

The dispute revolved around the caste status of the Gowari community in Maharashtra, which claimed entitlement to Scheduled Tribe (ST) benefits as Gon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Tribunal Order in Tribal Land Transfer Case — Transfer by Tribal to Non-Tribal Without Collector Permission is Void Under MRLS Tribes Act, 1974. Subsequent Purchasers Cannot Claim Protection as Original Transfer is Void Ab Initio.

28 Jun 2018

The petitioners, Ravindra Natthuji Dhobe and others, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Nagpur, which di...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Order Passed in Favour of Dead Person Under Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 — Proceedings Before Tahsildar Held to Be Judicial in Nature Requiring Impleadment of Legal Heirs.

12 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Dahiben wd/o Manoharbhai Patel through her legal heir Praful s/o Manoharbhai Patel, challenged an order of the Maharashtra Revenue Tri...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revisional Order Under Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974 — Limitation Period for Suo-Motu Revision Not Specified, But Power Must Be Exercised Within Reasonable Time. Revisional Authority Initiated Proceedings After 17 Years, Which Was Held Unreasonable and Unsustainable Under Section 7 of the Act.

5 Aug 2016

The petitioner, Bajirao Jivanrao Patil, was the purchaser of agricultural land from Rupchand Chindhu Patil, whose predecessor-in-title had purchased t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal Order in Land Tenancy Dispute — Held That Tenant's Right to Purchase Land Under Section 32G of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Is Not Extinguished by Mere Non-Payment of Purchase Price. The High Court Quashed the Tribunal's Order and Restored the Tenancy Court's Order, Directing Reasonable Time for Payment.

1 Dec 2010

The writ petition was filed by the legal heirs of the original tenant, Gondu Ramu Pandit (deceased), challenging the judgment and order dated 26th Oct...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Tribunal Order in Land Transfer Dispute Involving Tribal Vendor. Court holds that sale by tribal to non-tribal prior to amendment of Section 36 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 was valid and petitioner's possession cannot be disturbed.

18 Nov 2010

The petitioner, Nimba Bula Patil, filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 26.3.1991 passed by the Member, Maharashtra Revenue T...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Revenue Records Without Notice to Petitioner. Revenue Authority Directed to Decide Representation After Hearing All Parties Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Smt. Kausalyabai Kisand Dhande, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad challenging a mutation entry made in the ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)