Search Results for "suit and counterclaim"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...

Search Results for "suit and counterclaim"

292 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 292 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Written Statement to Include Counterclaim in Specific Performance Suit. Amendment Allowed as Trial Not Commenced and No Prejudice Caused to Plaintiffs Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.

30 Aug 2013

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed Regular Civil Suit No.135 of 2007 seeking specific performance of an agreement dated 9.3.1998 and claimed ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Plaintiff to File Written Statement to Counterclaim in Recovery Suit — Sets Aside Trial Court Order Dismissing IA No.7 as Not Maintainable. Section 151 CPC Inherent Power Can Be Invoked to Permit Filing of Written Statement to Counterclaim When No Specific Provision Bars It.

23 Nov 2016

The petitioner, Sri Dora Babu, was the plaintiff in O.S.No.4663/2010 pending before the XVII Additional City Civil & Sessions Judge, Bangalore. The su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Filing of Written Statement to Counterclaim Beyond 90 Days — Condonation of Delay Granted Due to Court Vacations and Lack of Objection. Order 8 Rule 6A CPC does not prescribe a specific period for filing written statement to counterclaim; the period of 90 days under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC is directory and not mandatory.

2 Jul 2010

The petitioners, who are the plaintiffs in Regular Civil Suit No.177/2007/A, challenged the order dated 20-8-2009 of the learned Civil Judge, Senior D...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Lessor's Appeal Against Dismissal of Counterclaim for Eviction and Rent in Lease Dispute — Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882 Section 41 Bars Counterclaim in High Court Original Suit for Specific Performance.

31 Jan 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by the legal representatives of Mahadev P. Kambekar (original defendant/lessor) against the judgment of the Bombay...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Production of Additional Documents in Commercial Summary Suit Under Order XI Rule 5 CPC — Inadvertence and Lack of Coordination Constitute Reasonable Cause. The Court held that the Plaintiff established reasonable cause for non-disclosure of balance sheets and emails that were referred to in the plaint and evidence but not annexed, and permitted their production subject to costs.

3 Feb 2025

The Plaintiff, Saffron Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a Commercial Summary Suit (No. 113 of 2019) against Premchand Resorts and Apartments and others for...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment in Favor of Contractor for Unpaid Construction Work — Unsupported Denial of Liability and Allegations of Poor Workmanship Do Not Raise Triable Issues Under Order 37 CPC. The court held that a defendant must disclose specific facts to obtain leave to defend; mere allegations without evidence are insufficient.

24 Aug 2012

The plaintiff, a sole proprietor of a construction firm, filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the de...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal by Plaintiff in Suit for Recovery of Money Due to Lack of Sufficient Evidence. Partnership Firm's Claim for Fabric Supplies Fails as Plaintiff Could Not Prove Exact Amount Due.

13 Mar 2026

Textile Connection, a partnership firm, filed C.S.No.29 of 2000 seeking a decree for Rs.39,67,144 with interest at 24% per annum from the defendants, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Admission of Winding Up Petition Due to Bona Fide Counterclaim. Company's claim for damages exceeding admitted debt constitutes a substantial defence under Section 434 of the Companies Act, 1956.

17 Jan 2017

The appellant, Prime Broking Company (India) Ltd., appealed against an order dated 28 June 2016 passed by the Company Judge admitting a winding up pet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Suit for Pecuniary Jurisdiction - Claims in Suit and Counterclaim Must Be Aggregated to Determine Court's Pecuniary Jurisdiction Under Section 6 of the Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869. The court held that the aggregate value of the suit claim and counterclaim determines the pecuniary jurisdiction, and since it exceeded the limit of the Junior Division, the suit must be transferred to the Senior Division.

15 Oct 2010

The petitioner, Dilip Khasbage, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 15/2/2010 pas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to File Written Statement and Counterclaim Under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC — Petitioner Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Delay Beyond 90 Days. The court upheld the trial court's discretion in refusing to condone the inordinate and unexplained delay in filing the written statement, holding that the statutory period under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC cannot be extended beyond 90 days except in exceptional circumstances.

28 Aug 2019

The petitioner, Vesta Building Products Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30 ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)