Search Results for "standing empowered committee"

528 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 528 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds 2020 Tribunal Rules with Modifications to Ensure Judicial Independence. Court directs changes to Search-cum-Selection Committee composition and member qualifications to align with constitutional principles.

The Supreme Court of India was called upon to decide the constitutional validity of the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities (Qualificat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Against Disqualification of Gram Panchayat Members Under Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act. Allegations of Encroachment on Government Land Led to Disqualification Under Section 14(1)(j-3); Petitioners Argued Encroachments Were by Spouses, Not Themselves.

The petitioners were elected members of Gram Panchayat Kalamb, with petitioner no.1 elected as Sarpanch. Respondent nos.5 and 6 filed a complaint on 5...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Arbitration Law Explained: Supreme Court on Existence and Validity of Arbitration Agreement (2026 Judgment)

he case involved a dispute between the parties regarding the applicability and validity of an arbitration clause contained in the agreement. The High ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

(SLP (C) No.28644 of 2019)

Background: The case involves a service dispute where an Executive Engineer (Civil) with the North Delhi Municipal Corporation was dismissed from serv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...