Search Results for "scheme employees"

2753 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2753 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds EPF Demand Against Regional Rural Bank for Uncovered Employees. Exclusion Under Section 16(1)(c) of EPF Act Not Applicable as Bank's Pension Scheme Did Not Cover All Workers, Following Pawan Hans Precedent.

The dispute arose from a demand by the Employees' Provident Fund Organisation for provident fund contributions amounting to Rs. 10,29,26,330/- against...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Appeal in Unfair Labour Practice Case Concerning Probation and Permanency. Employees Entitled to Confirmation After Three-Month Probation Under Model Standing Order 4A, Not Six-Month Contractual Period, and Parity in Benefits Under Settlement.

The dispute arose in an industrial establishment governed by the Maharashtra Industrial Relations Act, 1946 and the Model Standing Orders for Operativ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Assistant Professors' Promotion Under DACP Scheme Against Statutory Corporation's Recruitment Regulations. Promotion Governed by DACP Scheme as ESIC Regulations Issued Without Prior Central Government Approval Under Section 17(2)(a) of Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948.

The dispute arose from the promotion of Assistant Professors employed by the Employees' State Insurance Corporation (ESIC) to the post of Associate Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Petition Challenging Transfer of Employees Under EPF Act — Transfer of Employees to Subsidiary Not a 'Transfer of Establishment' Under Section 7A of EPF Act

The petitioner, Aviation Karmachari Sanghatana, a trade union representing employees of Pawan Hans Ltd. (respondent no.1), filed a writ petition chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Parity for Grampanchayat Employees with State Government Employees. Grampanchayat Employees Not Entitled to Same Benefits as State Government Employees Under Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958.

The petitioners, Maharashtra Rajya Grampanchayat Karmachari Mahasangh, a registered union of Grampanchayat employees, filed a writ petition seeking di...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Labour Court Order Declaring Transfer of Employees as Illegal Change Under Bombay Industrial Relations Act. Transfer from Polyester Department to Spurn Yarn Department Without Notice of Change Violates Section 42 Read with Schedule II Items 1,2,4,5 of BIR Act.

The petitioner, Indorama Synthetics (I) Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the judgment and order dated 5 December 2006 passed by the Labour Cour...