Search Results for "salary reimbursement"

96 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 96 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Teacher's Petition for Surplus Teacher Benefits Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioner failed to challenge DEO order for 11 years and did not comply with earlier court directions.

The petitioner, Hirabhai M Makwana, filed a writ petition under Articles 14, 21, and 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to quash an order dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Order Denying Salary Grant for Teacher. Court Holds That Approval of Appointment Entities Management to Grant-in-Aid Reimbursement.

The petitioners, Vikas Shikshan Sanshtha and Adiwasi Post Basic Ashram School, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 03.06.2014 passed by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Upholds Compensation of Rs. 47,20,116 for Death of Software Engineer. Negligence of Tractor Driver Proved; Insurance Company Liable to Pay Compensation Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim petition filed by the legal representatives of the deceased Shailesh, who died in a road accident on 10-12...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Writ Petition Challenging Retirement of Operatives Under Wrong Standing Orders — MRTU & PULP Act, 1971. Industrial Court directed to decide whether petitioners are Operatives governed by Standing Order 20-A or non-operatives under Model Standing Orders.

The petitioners, three employees of M/s Kohinoor Mills (a unit of NTC Ltd.), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Complaints. Summary jurisdiction under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act does not bar determination of disputed employer-employee relationship when status is prima facie established.

The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by Birla Cotsyn (India) Ltd., the employer, challenging identical orders passed by the Labour Court a...