Search Results for "revenue disclosure"

654 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 654 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Venture Capital Fund — No Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Applicability of Section 10(23FB) Exemption is Invalid.

The petitioner, DHFL Venture Capital Fund, is a trust registered as a venture capital fund under SEBI (Venture Capital Fund) Regulations, 1996. It fil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notices Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2008-09 Due to Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts and Change of Opinion. Remuneration Paid to Directors Was Fully Disclosed and Examined During Original Assessment, So Reopening Invalid.

The petitioner, M/s. OHM Stock Brokers Pvt. Ltd., a share and stock broker, challenged notices under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Transfer of Shares as Gift During Internal Restructuring Not Constituting Income Escape Assessment When Full Disclosure Made During Scrutiny.

The petitioner, Asian Satellite Broadcast Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company engaged in trading, investment, and finance, filed its return of income...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Reopening Beyond Four Years Requires Specific Disclosure Failure. General Statement of Non-Disclosure Not Sufficient Under Proviso to Section 147 Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, a real estate developer, challenged a notice dated 27/03/2019 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reopening the a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material — Full Disclosure of Waiver of Interest in Original Assessment Precludes Reassessment After Four Years.

The Petitioner, Lok Housing and Construction Limited, challenged a notice dated 29 March 2011 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, se...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening of Assessment Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material — Petitioner Had Disclosed All Facts in Original Assessment Under Section 143(3).

The petitioner, Milton Plastics Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 22.03.2004 is...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Reassessment Beyond Four Years Invalid Without Proof of Non-Disclosure Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, 3i Infotech Limited, challenged a notice dated 18 March 2009 issued by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax seeking to reopen the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reasonable Belief of Income Escaping Assessment. Reopening Beyond Four Years Without Fresh Material Constitutes Change of Opinion on Same Set of Facts.

The petitioner, Gateway Leasing Pvt. Ltd., a non-banking financial company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Artic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case — Disallows Reopening of Assessment Beyond Four Years Without Failure to Disclose Material Facts. Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Requires Full and True Disclosure for Reopening After Four Years.

The appellant, M/s. Safina Hotels Private Limited, filed its return of income for the assessment year 2001-02. The assessment was completed under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Writ Petitions Challenging Income Tax Reopening Notices Under Section 148. Court Examines Whether Reopening of Assessments for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15 Based on Alleged Non-Disclosure of Trust Dividend Income and Section 32AC Deduction Was Valid.

The matter involved two writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging the reopening of income tax assessments for Assessment Years 201...