Search Results for "removal motion"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "removal motion"

442 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 442 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Panchayat No Confidence Motion Case Due to Invalid Membership Based on Caste Certificate Non-Compliance. Member's Failure to Submit Validity Certificate Within Mandatory Period Under Section 10-1A of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959 Results in Retrospective Termination of Election, Making No Confidence Motion Valid.

21 Apr 2025

The dispute centered on the validity of a No Confidence Motion against the Sarpanch of Jambulani Gram Panchayat, which hinged on whether Appellant No....

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Sarpanch's Challenge to No-Confidence Motion — Non-Service of Requisition Copy Not Fatal Under Section 35 of Maharashtra Village Panchayat Act, 1958. Service of Notice Under Section 35 Read with Rule 2 of No-Confidence Rules Held Sufficient Compliance.

8 Aug 2024

The petitioner, Smt. Amrapali Sakharam Kamble, was elected as Sarpanch of Mhasrang Gram Panchayat on 26th February 2021. She remained absent from meet...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch in No-Confidence Motion for Violation of Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Bombay Village Panchayats (Meeting) Rules, 1959. Failure to Provide Three Days' Notice to Sarpanch Renders No-Confidence Motion Invalid.

22 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Nirmala w/o Pandharinath Sarde (Shiralkar), was the Sarpanch of Shirala Village Panchayat. She was removed from the post by a no-confi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Removal of Sarpanch for Violation of Mandatory Notice Requirements Under Bombay Village Panchayats (Meeting) Rules, 1959. No-confidence motion invalid as three-day notice not given to Sarpanch and motion not properly moved for voting.

22 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Nirmala w/o Pandharinath Sarde (Shiralkar), was the Sarpanch of Shirala Village Panchayat. On 22.12.2023, an extraordinary meeting was...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Directly Elected Sarpanch Challenging Removal by No-Confidence Motion. Court holds that removal of a directly elected Sarpanch must be by Gram Sabha under Section 35(1)(b) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats Act, 1959, and not by Gram Panchayat members under Section 55(2).

10 Feb 2022

The petitioner, Jijabai Parasram Aatram, was directly elected as Sarpanch of Gram Panchayat Dhamandari, a seat reserved for Scheduled Tribe Woman. On ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Trust Office Bearers. Scheme of Administration Does Not Prohibit No-Confidence Motion; Resolution Valid Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950.

3 Nov 2020

The petitioners, Lakhichand Marotrao Dhoble and Kisangopal Chunnilalji Gandhi, were the Chairman and Treasurer respectively of a public trust named Sh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Admiralty Suits as Time-Barred Under Limitation Act. Claims for Loss of Vessel and Cargo Filed Beyond Three-Year Limitation Period from Date of Vessel's Sinking.

17 Sep 2018

The judgment concerns two admiralty suits filed in the Bombay High Court. Admiralty Suit No.3 of 2011 was filed by the time charterer of the vessel 'N...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Demolition of Unauthorized Structures in Gaothan Areas — Municipal Corporation's Action Upheld as Valid Exercise of Power Under Section 351 of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888. The court held that the summary power under Section 351 does not require prior notice and the trial court's interim injunction was without jurisdiction.

5 Jul 2018

The case involves multiple appeals filed by various appellants against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and another respondent, challenging...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal in Municipal Election Dispute — Sets Aside Single Judge Order for Non-Joinder of Necessary Parties. The court held that the writ petition challenging the election of the President of the City Municipal Council was not liable to be dismissed for non-joinder of necessary parties as the appellants themselves were members of the council and had participated in the election.

8 Oct 2015

The case pertains to a dispute regarding the election of the President of the City Municipal Council, Basavakalyan. The appellants, Sultan Ali and Smt...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Removal of Adhyaksha of Grama Panchayat; Rule 3(7) of Karnataka Panchayat Raj (Motion of No Confidence) Rules, 1994, Prohibits Debate, and Non-Recording of Reasons Does Not Vitiate the Proceedings.

25 Mar 2014

The petitioner, Smt. Gangambike, had been elected as a member of Koppa Grama Panchayat, Piriyapatna Taluk, on 17 May 2010, and subsequently as Adhyaks...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)