Search Results for "recovery after retirement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "recovery after retirement"

544 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 544 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Municipal Employee Due to Inordinate Delay and Lack of Opportunity. Recovery of Rs.25,00,010/- set aside as show cause notice issued eight years after retirement without proper inquiry violates principles of natural justice under Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965.

20 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Samadhan Kisanrao Ingle, was a Tax Superintendent with the Municipal Council, Khamgaon, appointed on 16/04/1968 and retired on 30/06/2...

High Court

High Court Quashes Recovery Orders Imposed on Retired Junior Engineer Without Inquiry. Recovery of Rs. 86,52,163 and Withholding of Pension Without Departmental Inquiry Held Violative of Principles of Natural Justice.

11 Mar 2024

The petitioner, a retired Junior Engineer of Hubli Electricity Supply Company Limited (HESCOM), challenged orders dated 29-07-2021 and 16-10-2017 impo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Retired Employee’s Challenge to Recovery of Excess Pay from Pension Benefits. Court Holds That Voluntary Undertakings Bind Employee and Recovery Is Permissible Under Rule 134A of Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982, Distinguishing Rafiq Masih Based on Jagdev Singh.

6 May 2025

The petitioner, a retired Registrar of the District Court, Osmanabad, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery of Rs.1,40,030 from Retired Teacher in Pay Fixation Error Case. Recovery from Pensionary Benefits Without Prior Notice Held Unjust and Contrary to Supreme Court Precedent.

20 Apr 2018

The petitioner, Grace George Pampoorickal, was appointed as an Assistant Trained Teacher in 1970 and retired on 28 February 2010. Her last drawn pay w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Excess Payment Case — Recovery from Pension Without Opportunity of Hearing Violates Natural Justice. Recovery of Rs.1,35,513/- from pension of retired Extension Officer set aside for non-compliance with principles of natural justice.

1 Oct 2025

The petitioner, Dattatraya s/o Kalu Patil, was appointed as Extension Officer (Statistics) by the Zilla Parishad, Jalgaon on 19.10.1994. He was grante...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Disciplinary Proceedings Against Retired Bank Officer — Disciplinary Enquiry Cannot Be Initiated After Superannuation Without Specific Statutory Provision. The court held that under the Punjab National Bank (Employees') Pension Regulations, 1995, disciplinary proceedings can only be continued if instituted before retirement, and the charge-sheet issued after superannuation was invalid.

24 Apr 2026

The petitioner, a former General Manager of Punjab National Bank, retired on superannuation on 31st March 2017. After his retirement, the bank issued ...

High Court

Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition Challenging Show Cause Notice for Recovery of Excess Pay from Retired Employee. Recovery of Excess Salary Barred as per Rafiq Masih Principles Due to Long Delay and Hardship, but Re-fixation of Pay Permitted under Applicable Rules.

9 Jul 2026

The writ petition was filed by a retired judicial employee against the Sub-Judge, Principal District Judge, and the Registrar General of the High Cour...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Retired Medical Officer's Petition against Recovery of Excess Pay under Maharashtra Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1982 — Recovery Upheld Because Officer Had Given Undertaking and Was Not a Class-III or IV Employee. The Court held that the protections against recovery from retired employees under State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih do not apply when the employee has given an undertaking to refund excess payments, and Rule 134A of the Pension Rules expressly permits such recovery.

10 Mar 2017

The petitioner, Dr. Ravindra Shamrao Darunte, retired as a Medical Officer on 31 July 2015. The Accountant General (A&E), respondent No. 3, acting on ...

High Court

Madras High Court Upholds Setting Aside of Recovery of Excess Salary Paid to Retired Government Employee. Recovery of excess payment made after retirement causes hardship and is not sustainable.

8 Jun 2026

The case involves a writ appeal filed by the Deputy Director of Health Services and the Block Medical Officer against an order of a single judge setti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Pay Revision Case — Recovery from Pensionary Benefits Without Notice Held Unjust. The court held that an order revising pay scale and recovering excess amount from pensionary benefits, passed without affording opportunity of hearing and after retirement, is violative of natural justice and cannot be sustained.

12 Feb 2014

The petitioner, Dr. Gorakh Kashinath Solanki, was initially employed in 1978 as a Junior Assistant Scientist and retired on 31.05.2010 upon attaining ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)