Search Results for "reconstitution guidelines"

74 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 74 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Clubbed Petitions Challenging Ward Reservation Notifications in Municipal Elections. Petitioners Allege Illegal Reservation, Seek Quashing of Notifications and Direction for General Category Reservation.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging not...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by YES Bank in Shareholder Dispute Over Board Control and Share Transfer. Court upholds interim order restraining transfer of shares and appointment of directors pending final disposal of suit.

The present appeal arises from an interim order passed by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in a suit filed by the respondents (original...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Reservation Notifications for Urban Local Body Elections. Petitions seek to quash final notifications that deviated from draft notifications, alleging arbitrary classification and violation of constitutional provisions.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru took up a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Petitions Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution; Final Judgment Not Available in Extracted Text. Petitioners Challenge State Government's Ward Reservation Notifications Alleging Arbitrary Deviation from Draft Notifications.

These writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. The petitione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010179592018_1

A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka, challenging various no...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Cancellation of CL-2 Licences for Alleged Distance Violation — Held That Rule 8(2) of Karnataka Excise (Sale of Indian and Foreign Liquors) Rules, 1968 Does Not Apply to Shops Existing Before 2002 Amendment and That Show Cause Notice Must Precede Cancellation.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by M/s. Shankar Wines and M/s. Blue Peacock Ventures, both holders of CL-2 licences under the Karnataka...