High Court of Karnataka Hears Clubbed Petitions Challenging Ward Reservation Notifications in Municipal Elections. Petitioners Allege Illegal Reservation, Seek Quashing of Notifications and Direction for General Category Reservation.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 105
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging notifications issued by the State Government regarding reservation of wards in urban local bodies. The petitioners, including individuals such as Ravindra Nayak, P. Jayendra Kotian, and others, contended that the reservation notifications (dated 10.08.2018 and 30.07.2018) were arbitrary or illegal, particularly in relation to wards in the Mangalore City Corporation and other municipalities. They sought quashing of the notifications and directions to reserve certain wards for the general category as per earlier draft notifications. The respondents included the Karnataka State Election Commission, the State of Karnataka, the Mangalore City Corporation, and other municipal bodies. The petitions were clubbed for hearing. The extracted text does not contain the court's analysis, reasoning, issues framed, or the final order, as the judgment appears incomplete. Consequently, the decision and ratio decidendi are not available.

Issue of Consideration

KAHC010129732018_1

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (01) 29

W.P. No.44499/2018 (LB-ELE) c/w W.P. No.50796/2018 & other connected matters

2019-01-14

S. Sunil Dutt Yadav

Abishek Marla M.J., Ashok Haranahalli, Rajaram Sooryambail, Dhananjay Kumar, Udaya Prakash Muliya, Rahul S. Reddy, Devi Prasad Shetty, S. Basavaraj, M. Ravindranath, Naveen J. N., Nagarajappa A., Mahesh R. Uppin, K.N. Phaneendra, Vishwajith Shetty, Dinesh Rao, S.Rajashekar, Vaishali Hegde, Prathima Honnapura, R.Subramanya, D.C. Jagadeesh

Ravindra Nayak and Others

Karnataka State Election Commission and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging reservation notifications for wards in urban local bodies.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of reservation notifications and direction to reserve specific wards for the general category.

Filing Reason

Petitioners alleged that the reservation notifications were arbitrary, contrary to draft notifications, or otherwise illegal.

Procedural History

Multiple writ petitions were filed challenging ward reservation notifications issued by the State Government for various urban local bodies. The High Court of Karnataka clubbed them for hearing.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Corporation in Disciplinary Dismissal Case Due to High Court's Erroneous Reappreciation of Evidence. Employee's dismissal for fabricating false medical bills and cheating employer upheld under Conduct, Discipline and Appeal Rule...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Administrative Tribunal's Direction for Appointment in Municipal Selection Dispute. Tribunal's Direction to Appoint Candidate Selected Before Government Order Scrutiny Was Held Unjustified, but Municipality ...