Search Results for "railway project"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "railway project"

255 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 255 result(s)

Supreme Court

Delhi Metro Rail Corporation Ltd. vs. Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd.: Supreme Court’s Curative Ruling on Arbitration Award Restores High Court Verdict. Supreme Court overturns an arbitral award in favor of DAMEPL, citing patent illegality and a miscarriage of justice, reinstating the High Court’s findings.

10 Apr 2024

A curative petition filed by Delhi Metro Rail Corporation (DMRC) against Delhi Airport Metro Express Pvt. Ltd. (DAMEPL), the Supreme Court quashed an ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Transfer of Group A Railway Officer — Transfer Order Upheld as Administrative Necessity. Petitioner's All India Service Liability and Lack of Malice Justify Transfer Under Railway Establishment Rules.

16 Mar 2005

The petitioner, Naresh K. Gupta, a Group A officer serving as Ex-Chief Engineer (Construction and Survey) at the Western Railway Headquarters in Mumba...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Challenge to Land Acquisition for MIHAN Project — Upholds Validity of Notifications Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court holds that substantial compliance with Section 4(1) and Section 6 is sufficient and challenge after award is barred by delay and laches.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Bhawarlal Shankarlal Sarda and Lasmikant Shankarlal Sarda, filed two writ petitions challenging the land acquisition proceedings init...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Payment of Compensation for Railway Encroachment on Private Land Without Acquisition. Petitioner's land used for railway line without acquisition proceedings; court orders compensation under RFCTLARR Act, 2013.

29 Aug 2018

The petitioner, Sumit S/o Ashokkumar Bharadiya, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad alleging that the Railway Authorities...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Upholds Claims 1 and 4, Sets Aside Claims 5, 7, and 13 for Lack of Evidence and Non-Application of Mind. The court held that the arbitral tribunal failed to apply its mind to contractual provisions and evidence, rendering the award patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

6 May 2015

The Union of India (petitioner) filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a majority arbitral award...

Tribunals

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal in Insolvency Case Due to Lack of Privity of Contract. Operational Debt Claim Under Section 9 of IBC, 2016 Fails as No Direct Contractual Relationship Exists Between Appellant and Respondent.

25 Sep 2024

The present appeal was filed by Rahee Jhajharia E to E JV (the Appellant) under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) against t...

High Court

High Court Quashes Termination of Railway Contract as Arbitrary and Violative of Natural Justice. Writ Petition Maintainable Despite Arbitration Clause Under Article 226 of Constitution of India, as Termination Notices Dated 13.11.2025 and 02.12.2025 Were Issued Without Adequate Hearing and With Sufficient Time Remaining for Completion.

27 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a registered partnership firm, Petitioner, challenging the termination of its contract with Central Railway authorities for const...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows State Appeal in Land Acquisition Case for MRTS Project — High Court Direction for Alternate Site Quashed. Court holds that once acquisition is complete and possession taken, no direction for alternate site can be issued under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

1 Jul 2019

The case involves appeals by the State of Tamil Nadu against a common judgment of the Madras High Court directing allotment of alternate land to priva...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Land Oustee Rehabilitation Case — Policy for Preferential Employment Does Not Exempt Selection Process. The Court held that the Railway Board's policy for offering employment to displaced persons does not exempt them from undergoing the selection process; they must fulfill qualifications and be found suitable by recruitment committees.

1 Mar 2019

The dispute pertains to the rehabilitation of land oustees whose lands were acquired between 1984-85 and 1992-93 for the Sambalpur-Talcher Rail Link P...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Union of India's Appeal in Land Oustee Rehabilitation Case — Policy for Preferential Employment Does Not Exempt Selection Process. The Court held that the Railway Board's policy for preferential treatment to land oustees does not exempt them from undergoing the selection process; they must fulfill qualifications and be found suitable by recruitment committees.

1 Mar 2019

The dispute pertains to the rehabilitation of land oustees whose lands were acquired between 1984-85 and 1992-93 for the Sambalpur-Talcher Rail Link P...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)