Search Results for "railway board circular"

77 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 77 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Retired Railway Employee's Petition for Inclusion of Apprenticeship Period as Qualifying Service for Pension. Gap of 45 Days Between Completion of Apprenticeship and Regular Posting Breaks Continuity, Disentitling Claim for Pensionary Benefits.

The petitioner, a retired Railway employee, was appointed as an Apprentice Telecom Inspector on 23/12/1964 and completed his two-year apprenticeship o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment to Son of Second Wife in Railway Service — Railway Circular Does Not Exclude Children of Second Wife from Compassionate Employment. Court Directs Consideration of Application on Merits Under Master Circular No.16.

The petitioners, Smt. Girija Suresh Borade (second wife) and her son Sagar Suresh Borade, filed a writ petition against the Union of India and railway...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order for Compassionate Appointment. Rejection of elder brother's application for producing bogus certificate does not bar younger son's independent claim for compassionate appointment under Railway Establishment Code.

The case involves a challenge by the Union of India (Railway) against an order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) directing consideration of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's rejection of claim for extension of lease, finding no error of law or jurisdiction under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Prajapati Gunvant Keshavlal, was engaged in loading and unloading goods from railway wagons. On 11th June 2009, the respondent, Union ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Reference, Enhances Compensation for Acquired Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Determined Market Value Based on Comparable Sale Instances and Potential for Development, Rejecting Government's Valuation Method.

The case is a land acquisition reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, arising from the acquisition of land belonging to Godrej ...