Bombay High Court Allows Compassionate Appointment to Son of Second Wife in Railway Service — Railway Circular Does Not Exclude Children of Second Wife from Compassionate Employment. Court Directs Consideration of Application on Merits Under Master Circular No.16.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 175
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, Smt. Girija Suresh Borade (second wife) and her son Sagar Suresh Borade, filed a writ petition against the Union of India and railway authorities. The deceased employee, Suresh Shankar Borade, worked as a Khalasi-Helper with the Central Railway and died on 26 June 2007. He had married Vandana as his first wife, who withdrew from the marriage soon after without cohabiting. Seven years later, he married petitioner no.1. Petitioner no.2, their son, was a minor at the time of his father's death. Upon attaining majority on 16 September 2011, petitioner no.1 applied for compassionate appointment for her son. The application was rejected based on Circular No.5 of Master Circular No.16, which the respondents interpreted as excluding children of the second wife from compassionate employment. The court examined the circular and found that it only deals with sharing of settlement dues between widows and does not bar children of the second wife from compassionate appointment. The court held that the circular does not disentitle the children of the second wife from being considered for compassionate employment. The petition was allowed, and the respondents were directed to consider the application for compassionate appointment on its merits within eight weeks.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Compassionate Appointment - Children of Second Wife - Railway Circular No.5 of Master Circular No.16 - The issue was whether the son of the second wife of a deceased railway employee is eligible for compassionate appointment. The court held that the circular does not exclude children of the second wife; it only clarifies that settlement dues may be shared by both widows. The court directed the respondents to consider the petitioner's application for compassionate appointment on merits. (Paras 3-16)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the children of the second wife are entitled to be considered for compassionate employment under the Railway circulars.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to consider the application of petitioner no.2 for compassionate appointment on its own merits in accordance with the applicable rules and circulars within eight weeks from the date of this order.

Law Points

  • Compassionate appointment
  • second wife
  • children of second wife
  • Railway circular
  • Master Circular No.16
  • Circular No.5
  • eligibility for compassionate employment
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (BOM) (03) 321

WRIT PETITION NO. 9538 OF 2016

2019-03-01

A.S. Oka, Sandeep K. Shinde

2019:BHC-AS:7327-DB

Mr. Sandeep V. Marne for petitioners, Mr. T.J. Pandian for respondents

Smt. Girija Suresh Borade and Sagar Suresh Borade

Union of India, The Divisional Railway Manager (P), Sr. Divisional Finance Manager

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging rejection of compassionate appointment application for son of second wife of deceased railway employee.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought direction to respondents to appoint petitioner no.2 on compassionate ground.

Filing Reason

Rejection of application for compassionate appointment on the ground that petitioner no.1 being second wife, her son was not eligible.

Previous Decisions

Application for compassionate appointment was rejected by respondents relying on Circular no.5 of Master Circular no.16.

Issues

Whether children of second wife are entitled to compassionate employment under Railway circulars.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the circular does not exclude children of second wife; it only deals with sharing of settlement dues. Respondents argued that the circular disentitles children of second wife from compassionate appointment.

Ratio Decidendi

The circular no.5 of Master Circular no.16 only clarifies that settlement dues may be shared by both widows and does not exclude children of the second wife from being considered for compassionate employment. Therefore, the rejection of the application on that ground was not justified.

Judgment Excerpts

The issue involved in this petition is, whether the children of second wife are entitled to be considered for compassionate employment. It is clarified that in the case of Railway employees dying in harness etc. leaving more than one widow along with children born to the 2nd wife, while settlement dues may be shared by both the widows due to ...

Procedural History

The petition was filed in 2016. On 11 October 2018, parties were put to notice that the petition would be decided finally at the stage of admission. Heard on 3 December 2018 and judgment pronounced on 1 March 2019.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Tahsildar's Order Cancelling Mutation Entries in Tenancy Land Dispute — Exceeds Jurisdiction Under Maharashtra Land Revenue Code. Tahsildar Cannot Cancel Certificate Issued Under Section 38(E) of Hyderabad Tenancy and Agri...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Criminal Antecedents. Appellant's sentence reduced to period already undergone for producing forged land document to secure bail under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC.