Search Results for "promotion stay"

629 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 629 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Direct Recruit Section Officers' Seniority Over Promotees in Maharashtra Secretariat Service. Seniority to be determined from date of substantive appointment, not from date of ad-hoc promotion.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by direct recruit Section Officers and promotee Section Officers of the Maharashtra Secretariat Service, c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging School Tribunal's Order Setting Aside Promotion and Directing Promotion of Senior Teacher as Head Master. Seniority List Not Challenged Earlier Cannot Be Reopened in Appeal Under Section 9 of MEPS Act.

The case involves a challenge by petitioners, Krishna Mahadu Gasti (an Assistant Teacher promoted to Head Master) and Gram Vikas Shikshan Mandal (the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Challenge to Tribunal Order Directing Consideration of Employee for Promotion. Court upholds Tribunal's direction to consider suitability for promotion based on service record, rejecting State's argument that the employee was not eligible.

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal dated 27th November 1998 in Original A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Validity of Direct Recruitment of Lower Division Clerk in Aided Minority School. Petition Raises Question Whether LDC is a Promotional Post Under Rule 79 of Goa School Education Rules, 1986.

The petitioner, a peon working at St. Britto High School, an aided minority institution, filed a writ petition challenging the direct recruitment of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition Challenging Denial of Deemed Promotion Due to Censure Penalty. Censure is a minor penalty and cannot be the sole ground to deny deemed date of promotion when juniors were promoted earlier.

The petitioner, Shah Tejaskumar Vinodchandra, filed a Special Civil Application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Gujarat High...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reversion of Family Court Employees in Service Law Case — Promotions Made Without Following Recruitment Rules Are Void. Court Held That Appointments to Promoted Posts Must Be Made in Accordance with Statutory Rules and Not Merely on Administrative Orders.

The petitioners were employees of the Family Court, Mumbai, who had been promoted to higher posts such as Cashier, Shirestedar, and Assistant Shireste...