Search Results for "prejudicial activity"

181 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 181 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition and Quashes Detention Order in Goonda Case Due to Non-Application of Mind. Detaining Authority's Reliance on Irrelevant Bail Order Without Similar Facts Vitiated Subjective Satisfaction Under Section 2(f) of Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Karishma Kapoor, wife of the detenu Sai Sudhahar @ Sudhahar, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Supply of Incriminating Documents. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) Violated as Statements of Co-Accused and Call Data Records Not Furnished.

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Vilas Vithal Ambokar, challenged a preventive detention order dated 10th April 2015 passed by the Principal Secreta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Exercise of Power. Detenu's Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Was Frustrated by Delayed Consideration and Failure to Supply Relevant Documents.

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Mavin Keezhil Mohamed Aslam, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order in Bombay Police Act Case — Excessive Area and Lack of Nexus. Externment Order Covering Four Districts Set Aside as Prejudicial Activities Confined to Two Police Stations, Violating Section 56(1)(a)(b) of Bombay Police Act, 1951.

The petitioner, Ayub Abdul Sattar Shaikh, challenged an externment order passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Police, Zone-VI, Mumbai, under Section 5...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay Snapping Live-Link. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Delay of 25 Days in Passing Order Not Satisfactorily Explained by Detaining Authority.

The petitioner, Mandar Ajit Borkar, challenged his preventive detention order dated 14th October 2011 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mum...