Search Results for "parity principle"

408 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 408 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Reconsiders Land Owner's Cross Objection for Enhanced Compensation After Supreme Court Remand. Reconsideration Limited to Valuation of Trees and Classification of Survey No. 336 as Irrigated or Dry Crop Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The land owner filed a cross objection seeking enhancement of compensation awarded by the Reference Court in Land Acquisition Case No.281/2006. The Re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Equal Pay for University Personal Assistant with High Court Secretaries. Principle of 'Equal Pay for Equal Work' Not Applicable Where Work and Responsibilities Are Not Identical.

The petitioner, Vitthal Marutirao Ekbote, was appointed as a Stenographer (English) with the University of Pune on 11 June 1979 and served in the offi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bail Application of Accused in UAPA Case on Grounds of Parity and Merits. Parity with co-accused granted bail is not a valid ground when the applicant's role is distinct and the first bail application was rejected on merits.

The applicant, Dr. Gokarakonda Naga Saibaba, filed a second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking bail i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in MPSC Scam Case on Parity with Co-Accused. Personal Secretary to Minister Entitled to Bail as Co-Accused with Similar Role Already Released by Supreme Court and High Court.

The applicant, Avinash Tukaram Sanas, was accused No.7 in the MPSC Scam case, holding the post of a Class I Officer and Personal Secretary to a Minist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition by Court Officers Seeking Parity in Pension and Retirement Benefits with Higher Judicial Officers. Classification of employees into Class I and Class II based on duties and responsibilities is valid and not discriminatory under Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution.

The petitioners, fifteen officers of the High Court of Bombay holding positions such as Registrar, Prothonotary, Commissioner for Taking Accounts, Add...