
The Bombay High Court, Nagpur Bench, addressed a long-standing dispute concerning land compensation. The appellants sought enhancement of compensation for land acquired under the MIHAN Project in Nagpur, claiming parity with other similar cases where higher compensation had been awarded. The Court found that the previous judgment did not consider relevant evidence that led to disparities in compensation rates. The judgment was set aside, and the case was remanded to the Special Court for a fresh decision, with the inclusion of additional evidence.
The principle of parity in compensation for land acquisition cases. The Court held that the compensation awarded to the appellants should be reconsidered in light of similar cases. The appellants were entitled to a fresh trial where they could submit additional evidence to align their compensation with other claimants who received a higher award for similarly situated lands.
Case Title: Smt. Savitribai W/o Rajhans Ambagade (Dead) through Legal Representatives Versus Superintendent Engineer, Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation & Anr.
Citation: 2024 LawText (BOM) (8) 801
Case Number: FIRST APPEAL NO.694 OF 2023
Date of Decision: 2024-08-08