Search Results for "open prison"

389 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 389 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment for Mentally Ill Accused in Rape and Murder Case — Non-Compliance with Section 235(2) CrPC and Supervening Mental Illness Considered

The Supreme Court of India heard a review petition filed by an accused (referred to as 'Accused X') against his conviction and death sentence for the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Convict's Furlough Petition Due to Previous Absconding and Adverse Police Report. Petitioner had earlier jumped parole and remained absconding for over 5 years, leading to rejection of furlough under Parole and Furlough Rules, 1959.

The petitioner, Balya @ Rameshwar Motiram Yelekar, a convict lodged in Central Prison, Nagpur, filed a Criminal Writ Petition seeking release on furlo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Transfer of Investigation in Custodial Death Case. Court holds that investigation by CB-CID is independent and fair, and no ground for transfer to CBI is made out.

The petitioner, Ramprasad Gupta, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking transfer of investigation into the custodial deat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Furlough on Cash Surety for Life Convict Unable to Furnish Surety Due to Imprisoned Parents. Court Holds That Inability to Furnish Surety Should Not Deprive Prisoner of Furlough, Directs Release on Cash Surety of Rs.5,000 from Prison Earnings.

The petitioner, Anil Vishwanath Pathwe, a convict serving life imprisonment under Sections 302 and 498 of the Indian Penal Code, filed a letter-petiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Parole Order for Convict in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Arbitrary Rejection and Delay in Execution. Rejection of permanent parole on ground of not applying for regular parole held unsustainable; delay in implementing High Court order violates Article 21.

The appellant, Daulal, was convicted for offences under Sections 148, 448, 304 Part II read with 149, and 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, and sent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Rule 19(2) of Bombay Parole and Furlough Rules, 1959 as Unconstitutional — Mandatory One-Year Gap Between Parole Releases Violates Article 14 and 21. Rule 19(2) held arbitrary and irrational for imposing blanket bar without considering individual circumstances.

The petitioner, Kantilal Nandlal Jaiswal, a life convict undergoing sentence for murder under Section 302 read with Section 149 IPC, along with other ...