Bombay High Court Allows Furlough on Cash Surety for Life Convict Unable to Furnish Surety Due to Imprisoned Parents. Court Holds That Inability to Furnish Surety Should Not Deprive Prisoner of Furlough, Directs Release on Cash Surety of Rs.5,000 from Prison Earnings.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Anil Vishwanath Pathwe, a convict serving life imprisonment under Sections 302 and 498 of the Indian Penal Code, filed a letter-petition through jail seeking furlough leave. He had been arrested on 17 November 2005 and was in jail since then. In 2007, his furlough application was granted but on condition of furnishing cash security and surety of Rs.10,000 each. He had earlier filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 2581 of 2008, which resulted in an order dated 2 February 2009 allowing release on personal bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties. However, his uncle, who was willing to stand surety, died in 2009, and his parents were also lodged in jail for the same offence, leaving him with no one to stand surety. He therefore prayed for release on cash surety of Rs.5,000 from his prison earnings. The court appointed Mr. Arfan Sait as amicus curiae. The amicus curiae argued that the request was reasonable and cited several decisions of the Bombay High Court where similar relief was granted. The court, after hearing the parties, allowed the petition, directing the petitioner to be released on furlough on furnishing cash surety of Rs.5,000 from his prison earnings, with an undertaking to return after the furlough period. The court held that the inability to furnish surety due to the petitioner's circumstances should not deprive him of furlough.

Headnote

A) Prisons and Prisoners - Furlough Leave - Cash Surety - Bombay Furlough Rules - Petitioner, a life convict under Sections 302 and 498 IPC, sought furlough but could not furnish surety as his parents were also in jail and his uncle had died - Court allowed release on cash surety of Rs.5,000 from his prison earnings, relying on precedents where similar relief was granted - Held that inability to furnish surety due to circumstances should not deprive a prisoner of furlough (Paras 5-7).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a life convict who is unable to furnish surety for furlough leave due to his parents being in jail and other relatives deceased can be released on cash surety from his prison earnings.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Petition allowed. Petitioner to be released on furlough on furnishing cash surety of Rs.5,000 from his prison earnings, with an undertaking to return after the furlough period.

Law Points

  • Furlough leave
  • cash surety
  • personal bond
  • inability to furnish surety
  • prison earnings
  • amicus curiae
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2011 LawText (BOM) (11) 51

Criminal Writ Petition No. 1695 of 2011

2011-11-09

A.M. Khanwilkar, P.D. Kode

Mr. Arfan Sait (amicus curiae), Mrs. M.H. Mhatre (A.P.P.)

Anil Vishwanath Pathwe

D.I.G. Prison, Western Region, Pune; State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal writ petition seeking furlough leave on cash surety due to inability to furnish surety.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought release on furlough on furnishing cash surety of Rs.5,000 from his prison earnings.

Filing Reason

Petitioner could not furnish surety for furlough as his parents were in jail and his uncle had died.

Previous Decisions

Earlier, in Criminal Writ Petition No. 2581 of 2008, the court had ordered release on personal bond of Rs.10,000 and two sureties, but the petitioner could not comply due to lack of sureties.

Issues

Whether a life convict unable to furnish surety due to family circumstances can be released on furlough on cash surety from prison earnings.

Submissions/Arguments

Amicus curiae argued that the request was reasonable and relied on precedents where similar relief was granted. State did not oppose the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

Inability to furnish surety due to circumstances such as parents being in jail and relatives deceased should not deprive a prisoner of furlough; cash surety from prison earnings can be accepted.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner has asserted that other prisoners involved in similar offences have been released on offering cash surety. The learned amicus curiae submits that the request made by the petitioner is very reasonable, and ought to be granted.

Procedural History

Petitioner was arrested on 17 November 2005, convicted under Sections 302 and 498 IPC, and sentenced to life imprisonment. In 2007, furlough was granted on condition of cash security and surety. He filed Criminal Writ Petition No. 2581 of 2008, which resulted in an order dated 2 February 2009 for release on personal bond and two sureties. Unable to comply, he filed the present petition in 2011.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 498
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Furlough on Cash Surety for Life Convict Unable to Furnish Surety Due to Imprisoned Parents. Court Holds That Inability to Furnish Surety Should Not Deprive Prisoner of Furlough, Directs Release on Cash Surety of Rs.5,000 fro...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order for Reinstatement with Full Back Wages. Termination of Workmen Held to Be Colourable Exercise of Employer's Rights and Victimization Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.