Search Results for "ongoing real estate project"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "ongoing real estate project"

77 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 77 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Case, Holding That Acceptance of Delayed Possession Without Protest Does Not Waive Right to Interest Under Section 18 of RERA. Statutory Right to Interest Under RERA Cannot Be Waived by Mere Acceptance of Possession Without a Clear Agreement.

18 Jun 2026

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribu...

High Court

High Court Directs State to Establish Real Estate Regulatory Authority and Appellate Tribunal Under RERA, 2016 — Mandamus Issued for Compliance with Section 20(1).

20 Aug 2019

The petitioner, M/s. Panchmal Properties, a proprietorship concern represented by its proprietrix Ms. Preeti Shenoy, filed a writ petition under Artic...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Interest Dispute — Interest on Delayed Possession to Run from 1 July 2016, Not 1 January 2020, But COVID Period Excluded from Interest Liability. The court held that the promoter is liable to pay interest from the date of default as per the agreement, but the COVID-19 pandemic period is excluded from interest liability.

23 Jan 2024

The case involves two appeals filed by M/s. Pragatej Builders And Developers Pvt. Ltd. (the promoter) against a common judgment and order dated 7 Febr...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

1 Jan 2020

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 9 Petition by Developer Against Society in Redevelopment Dispute — Interim Injunction Granted to Protect Developer's Rights Pending Arbitration. The court held that the developer had a prima facie case and balance of convenience favored granting interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

12 Sep 2023

The judgment concerns three cross-petitions under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising from a dispute between a developer,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Grants Immunity to NBCC from Legal Proceedings in Amrapali Group Case — Dismisses Modification Plea for Interest Waiver by Royalgolf Link City Projects Private Limited. Court held that NBCC, as court-appointed project management consultant, is immune from being impleaded in other forums, and that interest on diverted homebuyer funds is necessary to prevent unjust enrichment.

10 Jun 2020

The Supreme Court disposed of multiple interlocutory applications in the ongoing Amrapali Group matter. In I.A. No.49238 of 2020, NBCC (I) Ltd., appoi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Resurrects Issue of Mandatory Naval NOC in Development Near Defence Establishments. The Court Examines Validity of Stop Work Notice and Deemed Commencement Certificate Under DCPR 2034, Citing Precedents and Regulatory Vacuum.

5 May 2026

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the stop work notice dated 24 October 2025 issued by MHADA and ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of CIDCO's Lease Cancellation in Tender Dispute. The court held that CIDCO's cancellation was unjustified as the partnership firm's bid was initially accepted, changes were authorized, and no concrete breaches of tender terms were proven, applying principles of promissory estoppel and administrative fairness.

29 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from a tender called by the City and Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra (CIDCO) on 11.06.2008 for lease of land near ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Real Estate Dispute — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Agreement to Sell and Possession. Appellant failed to prove readiness and willingness to perform contract under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

23 Apr 2024

The appellant, Mohammed Zain Khan, filed a Second Appeal before the Bombay High Court challenging the concurrent judgments of the trial court and the ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Consolidated Writ Appeals Challenging Acquisition Proceedings by Bangalore Development Authority. The appeals were filed under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act against the Single Judge's order dated 06.06.2006 that upheld the preliminary and final notifications for acquisition of lands.

3 Apr 2025

...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)