Search Results for "location advantage"

321 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 321 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Sudden Provocation. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the incident arose from a sudden quarrel without premeditation, reducing culpability to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.

The appellant, Raval Shaileshbhai Rameshbhai, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) by the learned Sessions Judge, Mahesana, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition of Company Seeking Mandamus to Permit Construction of Captive Jetty and Cement Plant in Mangrove Area. Court holds that prior environmental clearances are mandatory and the petitioner cannot circumvent the directions in PIL No.87/2006.

The petitioner, Adani Cementation Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 2013 and part of the Adani Group, filed a writ petition see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Affirms Need for Minority Establishment in AMU’s Minority Status Dispute" AMU’s Minority Status Under Scrutiny: Establishment by Legislature Versus Minority Founding Rights

The Supreme Court judgment in Aligarh Muslim University v. Naresh Agarwal & Ors. primarily deals with the issue of minority rights in education, f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Discharge of Accused in Rape Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence. Allegations of Repeated Rape and Criminal Intimidation Found Vague and Contradictory, Not Sufficient to Frame Charges Under Sections 366, 376(2)(n), 323, 504, 506, 341 IPC and Sections 3, 25 Arms Act.

The applicant, Dr. Avinash Manohar Warjurkar, accused no.1 in Sessions Trial No. 10 of 2017 pending before the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara, fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder and Attempt to Murder of Police Constables — Life Imprisonment Confirmed. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 353, 201 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act sustained based on credible eyewitness testimony and recovery of weapons.

The case involves two appeals filed by Raju @ Mukesh Punamchand Dangre and Dipak @ Golu Ananda Tayde against their conviction and sentence by the Addi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellants for Murder and Attempt to Murder of Police Officers. Circumstantial evidence including last seen theory and recovery of weapons held sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 302, 307, 353, 201 IPC and Section 25 Arms Act.

The case involves two appeals filed by Raju @ Mukesh Punamchand Dangre and Dipak @ Golu Ananda Tayde against their conviction and sentence by the Addi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Claimants' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case. Market Value of Irrigable Land Fixed at Rs. 1,00,000 per Acre Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves two cross-appeals arising from a land acquisition proceeding for the K.P.M.P. irrigation project in Akola, Maharashtra. The claimant...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping, Murder, and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Child Murder Case. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Motive Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 364, 302, and 201 IPC.

The appellant, Barku Bhavrao Bhaskar, was convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No.49 of 2001 for offences under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Land Acquisition Reference, Enhances Compensation for Acquired Land Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Court Determined Market Value Based on Comparable Sale Instances and Potential for Development, Rejecting Government's Valuation Method.

The case is a land acquisition reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, arising from the acquisition of land belonging to Godrej ...