Search Results for "land record correction"

537 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 537 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Correction of Land Acquisition Award to Reflect Petitioners as Owners Based on Civil Court Decree. The court held that revenue authorities are bound to give effect to a civil court decree declaring ownership and must correct the award under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners, Vishwanath and Chandrasen, sons of Girmaji Gonde, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Condonation of 50-Year Delay in Land Revenue Appeal — Unreasonable Delay Not Explained. Superintendent of Land Records lacked jurisdiction to condone inordinate delay under Section 247 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 without proper cause.

The case involves a writ petition filed by M/s. Aluwid Architectural Private Ltd and others (petitioners) challenging an order dated 6 September 2022 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Revenue Authority's Order Granting Partition/Correction of Record of Rights Under Section 85 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 — Civil Suit Does Not Bar Summary Revenue Proceedings.

The petitioner, Tarachand Goel, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 29-04-2015 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Nagpur Division, Na...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Corrigendum Reducing Compensation under National Highways Act, 1956. Competent Authority Lacks Power to Review Award; Section 33 of Right to Fair Compensation Act Not Applicable Absent Notification Under Section 105(3).

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenged a corrigendum issued by the Competent Authority under the National Highways Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance Due to Typographical Error in Date of Agreement. Correction of Date Does Not Change Nature of Suit and Is Necessary for Determining Real Controversy Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC.

The petitioner, plaintiff in a suit for specific performance (O.S. No. 132 of 2010) before the II Addl. Senior Civil Judge, Vijayapura, filed a writ p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses State's Petition Against SSRD Orders in Land Regularization Case. SSRD's Directions for Regularization Based on Auction Price Upheld as Within Jurisdiction Under Rule 108(6) of Gujarat Land Revenue Rules, 1972.

The dispute originated from the allotment of government land in 1967 to M/s. Nav Bharat Potteries Ltd. for a pottery industry at a concessional rate, ...