Search Results for "interest refund"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "interest refund"

2360 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2360 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Pre-deposit in VAT Matter — Mandamus Issued for Release of Rs. 16,11,19,226/- and Interest on Delayed Refund. Petitioner entitled to refund of pre-deposit amount with interest under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

16 Jul 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Flipkart India Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Seeking Interest on Delayed Refund of Special Additional Duty Under Customs Act — Interest Held Payable From Three Months After Initial Refund Application, Not From Subsequent Follow-Up Application

15 Oct 2024

The petitioner, M/s Ajay Industrial Corporation Ltd., filed a refund claim for Special Additional Duty (SAD) of Rs.7,40,458/- on 04 August 2014 under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes ITAT's Interim Refund Order in Pending Appeal — Tribunal Cannot Direct Refund Without Adjudicating Merits Under Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal lacks jurisdiction to grant interim relief without hearing the main appeal, as it would render the appeal infructuous and cause prejudice to the revenue.

4 Feb 2014

The Director of Income Tax (Exemption), Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25 November 2013 passed by the Income Tax Appellate T...

High Court

High Court Allows Refund of Court Fees in DRT Proceedings When Main Petition Becomes Infructuous — Court Fees Act, 1870 Section 13. The Debt Recovery Tribunal has inherent power to order refund of court fees under Section 13 of the Court Fees Act, 1870 when the main petition is disposed of as infructuous.

19 Nov 2024

The petitioners, Sri Narayana Murthy H M and Smt. Chandrakala R., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Interest on Delayed Refund of Pre-deposit in Customs Appeal — Pre-deposit Amounts Refundable with Interest from Date of Deposit When Appeal Succeeds. The Court held that pre-deposit made under Section 112 of Customs Act, 1962 is not a tax but a condition for appeal, and its refund must carry interest from the date of deposit when the appeal is allowed.

19 Jun 2013

The petitioners, Abdulla Gani and another, were appellants before the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) against an order of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Prospective Application of Section 234D. Interest Under Section 234D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 Cannot Be Charged for Assessment Year 2002-03 as the Provision Applies Only From Assessment Year 2004-05.

12 Sep 2012

The appeal by the revenue under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenged an order dated 24/11/2010 of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Unlawful Adjustment of Income Tax Refund Without Prior Intimation Under Section 245 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that adjustment of refund without prior intimation is illegal and directed refund with interest.

27 Jun 2023

The petitioner, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, a public sector undertaking, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Advance Stamp Duty Paid on Unexecuted Deed of Assignment — Petitioner Entitled to Refund Under Section 48 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 as No Instrument Was Executed

5 Jun 2023

The Petitioner, Kasthmandup Developers Pvt. Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 01....

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs. 3,00,100/- for Electronic Stamps Purchased Under Wrong Scheme Code. Mistake of Law Does Not Bar Refund When Stamps Not Used and No Unjust Enrichment.

29 Apr 2026

The petitioner, Manjeet Singh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a refund of stamp duty paid under a mistake of law. The peti...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Refund of Premium for Unutilized FSI in Land Development Case — Absence of Express Refund Provision Does Not Bar Refund When Privilege Not Availed. Appellants paid ₹30,46,290/- as premium for additional FSI but abandoned construction; Court held that retention of premium without utilization is unjust enrichment and directed refund with interest.

1 Jan 2026

The appellants, Prasad Pandurang Tapkir and Shakuntala Pandurang Tapkir, owned agricultural land in Survey No. 103/2/2 of Alandi Taluka, Pune District...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)