Search Results for "food adulteration"

133 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 133 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Revision in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Renders Prosecution Invalid.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Food Inspector, filed a Criminal Revision Application challenging the order of the learned Additional Sessions J...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Municipal Licensing Requirement for Food Business — Holds That MMC Act and FSS Act Can Coexist Without Repugnancy. Section 394(1)(e) of MMC Act, 1888 is Not Void Under Article 254 as It Operates in a Different Field of Municipal Regulation.

The petitioner, Sanjeev Rajaram Chimbulkar, a food business operator, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the Bombay Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision of Accused in Food Adulteration Case — Groundnut Oil Sample Found Adulterated. Accused Failed to Prove Due Diligence Under Section 19(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Kantilal Parasmal Jain, the original accused, challenging his conviction under Section 7...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Director's Petition to Drop Proceedings in Food Adulteration Case — Nominee Already Declared Under Section 17 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954. Director Cannot Be Prosecuted When Company Has Nominated a Person Responsible for Conduct of Business.

The petitioner, Afzal Abdul Khalek Ahmed, a director of M/s Recon Oil Industries Ltd., filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order dated 9th M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Discrepancy Between Analyst Reports and Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules. Acquittal of Accused Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Adulteration Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Food Inspector, appealed against the judgment and order dated 11/10/2000 passed by the 6th Judicial Magistrate F...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Proper Mixing and Sampling Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.

The State of Maharashtra, through Food Inspector S.G. Dharme, filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 10/05/2000 passed by the 6th Judici...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Directors and Company in Food Adulteration Matter Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Failure to Show That Accused Were In Charge of and Responsible for Business Conduct at Time of Offence Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The applicants, who were directors and a company (Marico Industries Ltd.), filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Service of Analyst Report. Failure to Serve Copy of Public Analyst Report on Accused Violates Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Resulting in Denial of Right to Request Re-analysis.

The case involves an appeal by the State of Maharashtra against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, Atul Taksande, proprietor of M/s Atul Provisi...