Search Results for "exclusive marks"

440 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 440 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Adjudicates Trademark Opposition Over 'Big Bite' Mark in Class 30. Court Considers Application of Prior User Test and Relevance of Trans-Border Reputation Under Trademarks Act, 1999.

The appeals were filed under Section 91 of the Trademarks Act, 1999 against a common order dated 18.7.2014 by the Deputy Registrar of Trade Marks. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Permanent Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit: Sun Pharma's 'SUN' Mark Protected Against 'ABSUN'. Deceptive similarity established as dominant feature 'SUN' is common; addition of prefix 'AB' insufficient to distinguish under Section 29(2)(b) of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The plaintiff, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., filed a suit seeking a permanent injunction to restrain the defendant, Satej M. Katekar, proprietor...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Trade Mark Infringement and Passing Off in Pharmaceutical Product 'ONCO BCG' - Defendant's Mark 'BCG ONCO' Held Deceptively Similar Despite Common Descriptive Element 'BCG'.

The plaintiff, Serum Institute of India Limited, a pharmaceutical company, filed a suit for trade mark infringement and passing off against Green Sign...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case Involving Beer Brands 'Haywards 5000' and '50000'. The court held that the numeral '5000' is an essential feature of the plaintiff's mark and that the defendants' mark '50000' is deceptively similar, leading to likelihood of confusion.

The plaintiff, Skol Breweries Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, Fortune Alcobrew Pvt. Limited and Hindust...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'EVANOVA' vs 'ECONOVA' for Pharmaceutical Products. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Under Section 29 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Charak Pharma Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Rectification of Trade Mark Registrations for 'WHISPER' and 'ALWAYS' Marks — Petitioner's Prior Use and Well-Known Status Established, Respondent's Registration Cancelled.

The petitioner, The Procter & Gamble Company, a multinational corporation, filed three original petitions under Sections 47, 57, and 125 of the Trade ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Injunction in Trade Mark Infringement Suit — 'SUPER MOR CHHAP' Held Deceptively Similar to 'MOR CHHAP'. Registration and Prior Use of 'MOR CHHAP' for Lime Plaster Entitled Plaintiff to Protection Under Trade and Merchandise Act, 1958.

The plaintiff, Sunil Manikchand Kasliwal, filed a suit for trade mark infringement against the defendant, Rahul Uttam Suryavanshi, alleging that the d...