Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case Involving Beer Brands 'Haywards 5000' and '50000'. The court held that the numeral '5000' is an essential feature of the plaintiff's mark and that the defendants' mark '50000' is deceptively similar, leading to likelihood of confusion.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 10
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The plaintiff, Skol Breweries Limited, filed a suit for infringement and passing off against the defendants, Fortune Alcobrew Pvt. Limited and Hindustan Breweries & Bottling Limited, for using the mark '50000' in respect of beer. The plaintiff is the registered proprietor of the trademark 'Haywards 5000', which has been in use since 1983. The plaintiff acquired the trademark from defendant No.3, Shaw Wallace & Co. Ltd. The plaintiff contended that the numeral '5000' is a dominant and essential feature of its mark and that the defendants' mark '50000' is deceptively similar, both phonetically and structurally. The defendants argued that '5000' is descriptive of the strength of the beer and that their mark '50000' is distinct. The court held that the marks are deceptively similar and that the plaintiff's mark has acquired distinctiveness through long and extensive use. The court granted an injunction restraining the defendants from using the mark '50000' or any other deceptively similar mark. The court also rejected the defendants' argument that registration of their mark protects them from an infringement action.

Headnote

A) Trademark Law - Infringement - Deceptive Similarity - Section 29(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 - The plaintiff's registered trademark 'Haywards 5000' and the defendants' mark '50000' are phonetically and structurally similar, leading to likelihood of confusion among consumers. The numeral '5000' is an essential feature of the plaintiff's mark. (Paras 1-10)

B) Trademark Law - Passing Off - Goodwill and Reputation - The plaintiff has established substantial goodwill and reputation in the mark 'Haywards 5000' through continuous use since 1983. The defendants' adoption of '50000' is likely to deceive or cause confusion, amounting to passing off. (Paras 11-15)

C) Trademark Law - Registration - Effect of Registration - Registration of a trademark does not confer a right to use a mark that infringes another's prior registered mark. The defendants' registration of '50000' does not protect them from an action for infringement. (Paras 16-20)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the use of the mark '50000' by the defendants constitutes infringement of the plaintiff's registered trademark 'Haywards 5000' and amounts to passing off.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the notice of motion and granted an injunction restraining the defendants from using the mark '50000' or any other mark deceptively similar to the plaintiff's trademark 'Haywards 5000'.

Law Points

  • Trademark infringement
  • passing off
  • deceptive similarity
  • phonetic similarity
  • essential feature of trademark
  • likelihood of confusion
  • registration not a defense for infringement
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012:BHC-OS:4887

Notice of Motion No. 1 of 2008 in Suit No. 3653 of 2007

2012-03-31

S.J. Vazifdar, J.

2012:BHC-OS:4887

Mr. Virag Tulzapurkar, Senior Counsel with Mr. Himanshu W. Kane, Mr. Hiren Kamod i/b Himanshu W. Kane for the Plaintiff; Mr. Alankar Kirpekar i/b Mr. S.J. Khera for Defendant No.1; Mr. S.J. Khera i/b S.J. Khera and Sucharita Patra for Defendant No.2

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit for trademark infringement and passing off

Remedy Sought

Injunction restraining defendants from using the mark '50000' or any deceptively similar mark

Filing Reason

Defendants adopted the mark '50000' for beer, which is deceptively similar to plaintiff's registered trademark 'Haywards 5000'

Issues

Whether the defendants' use of the mark '50000' infringes the plaintiff's registered trademark 'Haywards 5000' under Section 29(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999. Whether the defendants' use of the mark '50000' amounts to passing off the defendants' goods as those of the plaintiff.

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff argued that '5000' is a dominant and essential feature of its mark and that '50000' is phonetically and structurally similar, causing confusion. Defendants argued that '5000' is descriptive of beer strength and that their mark '50000' is distinct and registered.

Ratio Decidendi

The numeral '5000' is an essential feature of the plaintiff's trademark 'Haywards 5000' and the defendants' mark '50000' is deceptively similar, leading to likelihood of confusion. Registration of a mark does not protect against infringement of a prior registered mark.

Judgment Excerpts

This is an action for infringement and passing off. The plaintiff is the registered proprietor of the trademark 'Haywards 5000'. The first defendant has adopted the mark '50000' in respect of beer.

Procedural History

The plaintiff filed Suit No. 3653 of 2007 and Notice of Motion No. 1 of 2008 seeking interim relief. The court heard the motion and delivered judgment on 31st March 2012.

Acts & Sections

  • Trade Marks Act, 1999: Section 29(2)(b)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case Involving Beer Brands 'Haywards 5000' and '50000'. The court held that the numeral '5000' is an essential feature of the plaintiff's mark and that the defendants' mark '50000' is dece...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Quashing of Government Resolution on Seniority for SC/ST Promotions in Orissa Administrative Service. Catch-Up Rule Prevails Absent State Legislation Under Article 16(4A) After 85th Amendment.