Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Involving 'Ankur' Mark — Plaintiff Establishes Prima Facie Case of Passing Off and Likelihood of Confusion. The court held that the defendants' use of the identical mark 'Ankur' for identical goods constitutes infringement and passing off under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 62
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The plaintiff, Innovations Garment Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the defendants, Bhavesh Ramjibhai Gada and others, for using the mark 'Ankur' in relation to garments and textile products. The plaintiff claimed to be the prior user and registered proprietor of the mark 'Ankur' since 1995. The defendants were using the identical mark for identical goods, leading to confusion and deception among consumers. The court considered the applications for interim injunction. The plaintiff argued that it had acquired substantial goodwill and reputation in the mark, and the defendants' adoption was dishonest. The defendants contended that the mark was descriptive and common to trade. The court analyzed the evidence and found that the plaintiff had made out a prima facie case of infringement and passing off. The balance of convenience was in favor of the plaintiff, and irreparable loss would be caused if the injunction was not granted. The court granted an interim injunction restraining the defendants from using the mark 'Ankur' or any deceptively similar mark pending disposal of the suit.

Headnote

A) Trademark Law - Infringement and Passing Off - Interim Injunction - Sections 134, 135 Trade Marks Act, 1999 - Plaintiff sought interim injunction against defendants for using mark 'Ankur' for garments - Court held that plaintiff made out a prima facie case of passing off and likelihood of confusion, balance of convenience in favor of plaintiff, and irreparable loss would be caused if injunction not granted - Held that defendants' use of identical mark for identical goods constitutes infringement and passing off (Paras 1-22).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the plaintiff is entitled to an interim injunction restraining the defendants from using the mark 'Ankur' or any deceptively similar mark in relation to garments and textile products.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Interim injunction granted restraining the defendants from using the mark 'Ankur' or any deceptively similar mark in relation to garments and textile products pending disposal of the suit.

Law Points

  • Trademark infringement
  • passing off
  • interim injunction
  • prima facie case
  • balance of convenience
  • irreparable loss
  • likelihood of confusion
  • deceptive similarity
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025:BHC-OS:20477

Interim Application No. 1681 of 2025 in Commercial IP Suit No. 80 of 2025, with Interim Application No. 1802 of 2025 in Commercial IP Suit No. 294 of 2024, with Interim Application No. 1322 of 2024 in Commercial IP Suit No. 101 of 2024

2025-11-10

2025:BHC-OS:20477

Innovations Garment Pvt. Ltd.

Bhavesh Ramjibhai Gada and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit for trademark infringement and passing off

Remedy Sought

Interim injunction restraining defendants from using the mark 'Ankur' or any deceptively similar mark

Filing Reason

Defendants using identical mark 'Ankur' for identical goods causing confusion and deception

Issues

Whether the plaintiff has made out a prima facie case for grant of interim injunction? Whether the balance of convenience lies in favor of the plaintiff? Whether the plaintiff would suffer irreparable loss if injunction is not granted?

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff argued that it is the prior user and registered proprietor of the mark 'Ankur' since 1995, and the defendants' adoption is dishonest and causes confusion. Defendants contended that the mark 'Ankur' is descriptive and common to trade, and no injunction should be granted.

Ratio Decidendi

The plaintiff established a prima facie case of trademark infringement and passing off, balance of convenience is in favor of the plaintiff, and irreparable loss would be caused if injunction is not granted.

Judgment Excerpts

The plaintiff has made out a prima facie case for grant of interim injunction. Balance of convenience is in favor of the plaintiff. Irreparable loss would be caused to the plaintiff if injunction is not granted.

Procedural History

The plaintiff filed Commercial IP Suit No. 80 of 2025 along with Interim Application No. 1681 of 2025, and similar suits and applications were filed earlier. The court heard all matters together and passed this order.

Acts & Sections

  • Trade Marks Act, 1999: 134, 135
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Involving 'Ankur' Mark — Plaintiff Establishes Prima Facie Case of Passing Off and Likelihood of Confusion. The court held that the defendants' use of the identical mark 'An...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Application to Set Aside Dismissal of Appeal for Non-Compliance of Order to Bring Legal Representatives on Record. Order XXXIX Rule 11 CPC Held Inapplicable to Dismissal for Default; Sufficient ...