Search Results for "excess attachment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "excess attachment"

143 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 143 result(s)

High Court

High Court Quashes Tax Refund Adjustment Order for Violation of Settlement Scheme and Natural Justice. Adjustment of refund for one tax period against demand for another under proviso to Section 50(1) of Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 held invalid when petitioner had applied under Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears of Tax, Interest, Penalty or Late Fees Act, 2023 and no defect notice was issued.

12 Mar 2026

The dispute involved a proprietorship concern registered under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 challenging a settlement order dated 18 April...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Execution Court Order in Land Acquisition Dispute — Defense Estate Officer Succeeds in Setting Aside Ex-Parte Order Due to Lack of Notice. The Court held that the execution court failed to issue notice to the judgment debtor before proceeding with execution, violating principles of natural justice under Order XXI Rule 22 CPC.

20 Aug 2025

The petitioner, The Defense Estate Officer, Karnataka and Goa Circle, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Property Tax Attachment and Auction, Directs Corporation to Accept Payment from Applicant and Withdraw Attachment. The court held that the applicant's payment under protest and subsequent demand draft should be accepted, and the attachment and auction notices should be withdrawn.

24 Feb 2023

The petitioner, M/s. Natvar Properties Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition challenging the warrant of attachment dated 14th March 2011 and notice of auct...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Disposes of Appeal in Debt Recovery Case with Interim Deposit and Attachment Orders. Court directed appellant to deposit Rs.5 crores, permitted respondent to withdraw amounts, continued attachment of shares, and ordered timely disposal of pending appeal under the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993.

27 Oct 2021

The Supreme Court of India disposed of a civil appeal arising from a special leave petition, which challenged the High Court of Rajasthan's dismissal ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Case by Restoring Arbitral Award. High Court's Setting Aside of Award Under Section 37(1)(c) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Found Erroneous as It Exceeded Scope of Judicial Review.

28 Jul 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard a civil appeal arising from a dispute between PSA Sical Terminals Pvt. Ltd., the appellant, and The Board of Trustees...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 9 Arbitration Petition and Winding Up Petition Against Corporate Debtor — No Prima Facie Case for Interim Relief or Insolvency as CDR Scheme Was Under Consideration and Debt Was Not Clearly Due.

6 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Tata Capital Financial Services Ltd., a non-banking financial company, granted a term loan of Rs. 50 crores to the first respondent, U...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Section 9 Orders in Arbitration Disputes — Interim Relief Set Aside Due to Lack of Urgency and Failure to Seek Enforcement of Mortgage. Court holds that when a creditor has a mortgage over property, the appropriate remedy is to enforce the mortgage rather than seek interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, especially when arbitration proceedings are already pending or an award has been passed.

8 Aug 2013

The appeals arose from a judgment and order of a learned Single Judge dated 5 February 2013, which granted interim relief under Section 9 of the Arbit...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Possession Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963 — Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Prior Possession and Dispossession Within Six Months. Court Held That Summary Suit Under Section 6 Cannot Be Used to Decide Title and Requires Strict Proof of Possession and Unlawful Dispossession.

4 May 2012

The plaintiffs, including Amod Nandkishore Mehra and others, filed a suit under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, seeking restoration of pos...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Application in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Plaint Ordered to be Returned for Presentation to Proper Court Due to Lack of Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that the City Civil Court at Dindoshi lacked jurisdiction over immovable property situated in Kandivali, and the plaint must be returned under Order VII Rule 10 CPC.

10 Oct 2011

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendant no. 4, Manju Narendra Gupta, challenging an order of the City Civil Cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Sale Confirmation in Debt Recovery Proceedings — Auction Sale Valid Despite Alleged Irregularities Under Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993. Inadequacy of Price Not Sufficient to Set Aside Sale Unless It Shocks Conscience; No Substantial Injury Proved.

24 Nov 2010

The petitioners, Asha Mehta and another, were judgment debtors against whom Allahabad Bank had obtained a decree for recovery of Rs.33.51 crores with ...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)