Supreme Court Disposes of Appeal in Debt Recovery Case with Interim Deposit and Attachment Orders. Court directed appellant to deposit Rs.5 crores, permitted respondent to withdraw amounts, continued attachment of shares, and ordered timely disposal of pending appeal under the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993.

  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India disposed of a civil appeal arising from a special leave petition, which challenged the High Court of Rajasthan's dismissal of a writ petition. The writ petition had confirmed the order of the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), Delhi, which maintained the attachment of shares held by appellant no.1, XLO India Limited, during the pendency of Appeal No.1/2020 before the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Jaipur. The dispute centered on a debt of approximately Rs.29 crores claimed by respondent no.1, International Asset Reconstruction Company Private Limited, which was contested by the appellants, who argued that the amount had been paid and the issue pertained to discharge of debt in execution proceedings. After hearing arguments from both sides, the court noted a broad consensus between the parties and disposed of the appeal with specific directions. The court ordered appellant no.1 to deposit an additional Rs.5 crores with the DRT, Jaipur, within four weeks, permitted respondent no.1 to withdraw this amount along with a pre-deposit of Rs.1.53 crores with interest and Rs.25 lakhs lying with the Recovery Officer, all without prejudice to the parties' rights in the pending appeal. It directed the DRT to finally decide Appeal No.1/2020 within eight weeks, continued the attachment of shares until the appeal's disposal, stayed further recovery proceedings, and disposed of a related appeal before the DRAT challenging the pre-deposit order. The court kept questions of law open for consideration in appropriate cases.

Headnote

A) Debt Recovery Law - Interim Relief and Attachment - Attachment of Shares During Pendency of Appeal - Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993, Section 25 - Appellants challenged dismissal of writ petition confirming DRAT order maintaining attachment of shares - Supreme Court disposed appeal based on consensus, directing continuation of attachment till final disposal of appeal and staying further recovery proceedings - Held that attachment order confirmed by DRAT to continue and further recovery proceedings stayed pending appeal disposal (Paras 3, 8, 9).

B) Debt Recovery Law - Pre-Deposit and Withdrawal - Conditions for Deposit and Withdrawal Pending Appeal - Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 - Appellants to deposit Rs.5 crores within four weeks, respondent permitted to withdraw this amount along with pre-deposit of Rs.1.53 crores with interest and Rs.25 lakhs lying with Recovery Officer - Withdrawal without prejudice to rights in pending appeal and subject to ultimate outcome - Held that deposit and withdrawal permitted as per agreed terms (Paras 8, 9).

C) Debt Recovery Law - Disposal of Appeal - Timely Disposal of Pending Appeal - Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 - Appeal No.1/2020 pending before DRT, Jaipur - Supreme Court directed DRT to finally decide and dispose of appeal within eight weeks - Held that DRT directed to decide appeal on merits within stipulated time (Paras 8, 9).

D) Debt Recovery Law - Procedural Disposal - Disposal of Related Appeal - Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993 - Respondent's appeal before DRAT challenging order of pre-deposit of Rs.1.53 crores - Supreme Court disposed of said appeal in view of the order - Held that appeal before DRAT stands disposed of (Para 9).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether to grant interim relief and set conditions for deposit and withdrawal of amounts pending disposal of the appeal before the Debts Recovery Tribunal

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal disposed of with directions: appellant no.1 to deposit Rs.5 crores within four weeks; respondent no.1 permitted to withdraw Rs.5 crores, Rs.1.53 crores with interest, and Rs.25 lakhs; attachment of shares continued till final disposal of Appeal No.1/2020; further recovery proceedings stayed; DRT directed to decide Appeal No.1/2020 within eight weeks; related appeal before DRAT disposed of; questions of law kept open

Law Points

  • Interim relief in debt recovery proceedings
  • attachment of shares during pendency of appeal
  • pre-deposit and withdrawal conditions
  • stay of further recovery proceedings pending disposal of appeal
  • disposal of appeal based on consensus between parties
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (10) 68

Civil Appeal No. of 2021 (Arising from SLP(C) No. 14464/2021)

2021-10-27

M.R. Shah, A.S. Bopanna

Shri Dhruv Mehta, Mrs. Suruchi Kasliwal, Mr. Shyam Aggarwal, Mr. Amit Pawan, Mr. Hassan Zubair Waris, Ms. Shivangi, Shri K. V. Viswanathan, Mr. Amarjit Singh Bedi, Mr. R.P. Agrawal, Ms. Manisha Agrawal, Ms. Pragati Agrawal, Ms. Priyal Modi, Mr. Varun Chandiok, Ms. Riya Seth

XLO India Limited and Another

International Asset Reconstruction Company Private Limited & Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil appeal arising from special leave petition challenging High Court dismissal of writ petition confirming DRAT order

Remedy Sought

Appellants sought relief against attachment of shares and recovery proceedings

Filing Reason

Challenge to impugned judgment and order dated 06.09.2021 passed by High Court of Rajasthan

Previous Decisions

High Court dismissed writ petition confirming DRAT order; DRAT disposed appeal maintaining attachment of shares and directing recovery proceedings under Section 25 of Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993

Issues

Interim relief and conditions for deposit and withdrawal pending disposal of appeal Continuation of attachment of shares during pendency of appeal Timely disposal of pending appeal before DRT

Submissions/Arguments

Appellants disputed amount due and payable, claiming payment made and issue of discharge of debt Respondents claimed approximately Rs.29 crores due and payable

Ratio Decidendi

Interim relief can be granted with conditions for deposit and withdrawal without prejudice to rights in pending appeal; attachment of shares may continue during pendency of appeal to secure recovery; courts may direct timely disposal of pending appeals to expedite resolution

Judgment Excerpts

Leave granted. The present appeal arises out of the impugned judgment and order dated 06.09.2021 passed by the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jaipur in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9260/2021 by which the High Court has dismissed the said writ petition preferred by the appellants herein confirming the judgment and order passed by the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT), Delhi passed in Appeal No.82/2020. By judgment and order dated 9.8.2021, the DRAT, Delhi has disposed of the said appeal preferred by the respondents herein maintaining the order of attachment of share held by appellant no.1 as XLO India Limited during the pendency of Appeal No.1/2020. However, the DRAT has also directed and observed that in the meanwhile recovery proceedings will go on before the Recovery Officer who will try to recover the decretal amount in accordance with the provisions of Section 25 of the Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993. It is not in dispute that Appeal No.1/2020 is pending consideration by the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Jaipur. However, at the same time, according to respondent no.1 herein approximately a sum of Rs.29 crores is due and payable by appellant no.1, which is disputed by Shri Dhruv Mehta, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the appellants, more particularly on behalf of appellant no.1. It appears that the case on behalf of appellant no.1 in Appeal No.1/2020 seems to be that the amount due and payable by appellant no.1 has been paid and the question is of discharge of debt in the execution proceedings. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties and at the suggestion by the Court, there is broad consensus between the learned counsel for the parties to dispose of the present appeal in the following terms. In view of the above broad consensus between the learned counsel for the respective parties recorded hereinabove, we dispose of the present appeal as under.

Procedural History

DRAT disposed appeal on 9.8.2021 maintaining attachment of shares; High Court dismissed writ petition on 06.09.2021; Supreme Court granted leave and disposed appeal on 27.10.2021 with directions

Acts & Sections

  • Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act, 1993: Section 25
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Disposes of Appeal in Debt Recovery Case with Interim Deposit and Attachment Orders. Court directed appellant to deposit Rs.5 crores, permitted respondent to withdraw amounts, continued attachment of shares, and ordered timely disposal ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Management's Appeal in Teachers' Wage Arrears Case Under Maharashtra School Rules. Full arrears under 5th and 6th Pay Commissions upheld as employer's duty to implement pay revisions automatically without requiring employees t...