Search Results for "commercial arbitration petition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "commercial arbitration petition"

1240 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1240 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Strike Off Defence in Foreign Award Enforcement Proceedings. Security Deposit Condition Not a Bar to Defend Petition on Merits Under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC and Section 49 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Oct 2012

The petitioners, Pacific Basin Handymax (UK) Ltd., filed a Notice of Motion under Order 39 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to st...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Construction Contract Dispute. Work Order Containing Arbitration Clause Constitutes Valid Arbitration Agreement Between Contractor and Property Owner.

25 Jul 2019

The petitioner, M/s. Shilpi Constructions Engineers & Contractors, filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, se...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Holds Writ Petition Not Maintainable Against Arbitrator's Order on Jurisdiction Under Section 16 and Order Appointing Arbitrator Under Section 11; Alternative Remedies U/S 34 and Article 136 Must Be Availed. The court found that an order under Section 11 is challengeable only before the Supreme Court under Article 136, and a Section 16 order can be contested after the award under Section 34, thus barring writ jurisdiction.

17 Oct 2023

This writ petition arose from a contractual dispute between Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL), a government enterprise, and a joint ventu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Over Coal Supply Contracts — Failure to Provide Load Port Report Constitutes Dispute. Court holds that existence of arbitration clause and failure of respondent to appoint arbitrator entitles petitioner to seek appointment under Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

29 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Era International, a partnership firm engaged in importing coal, entered into three sale contracts with the respondent, Aditya Birla G...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability Objection Under Section 42 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in Petition Challenging Arbitral Award. Preliminary Objection Centers on Whether Prior Section 9 Application in Baroda Court and Lack of Cause of Action Oust High Court's Jurisdiction to Entertain Section 34 Petition.

5 Jun 2006

The petitioner, Ion Exchange (India) Ltd., challenged an arbitral award directing it to pay certain amounts to the respondent, Paramount Limited, by f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Against Partial Arbitral Awards in Koyna Hydro Electric Project Sub-Contract Dispute. Challenge to awards failing on grounds of settlement and coercion under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

8 Jan 2016

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Patel Engineering Co. Ltd. (th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Commercial Dispute Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Unilateral Appointment Clause Not Barred as Respondent Failed to Respond to Invocation Notice.

27 Jul 2022

The petitioner, Uttam Energy Ltd., filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of an arbitral...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Section 11 Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in International Commercial Arbitration Dispute. Holds that BSA governed by Benin law with foreign seat cannot be brought under Part I of Arbitration Act, and issue estoppel applies due to dismissal of anti-arbitration injunction.

30 Nov -0001

The Supreme Court dismissed an arbitration petition filed by Balaji Steel Trade under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, see...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in International Commercial Arbitration Dispute — Seat of Arbitration Determined as Hong Kong Based on Clause 17.2 of MoU.

5 Mar 2020

The petitioner, Mankastu Impex Private Limited, an Indian company, and the respondent, Airvisual Limited, a Hong Kong company, entered into a Memorand...

High Court

High Court Appoints Arbitrator in Contract Dispute Between Power Solutions Company and Electricity Supply Company. Petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 allowed due to failure of respondent to appoint arbitrator as per clause 4.1 of contract agreement dated 28.03.2018.

21 Apr 2022

The petitioner, M/s Nsure Reliable Power Solutions Pvt Ltd, a private limited company engaged in infrastructure business, participated in a tender flo...

1 2 3 4 5

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)