C.S.(Comm.Div.) No.205 of 2023
12 Mar 2025The plaintiff, VGN Projects Estates Private Limited, filed commercial suit no.205 of 2023 against the defendants, M/s. VGK Builders Pvt. Ltd. and M/s....
Search Results for "builders"
1412 result(s) found
Found 1412 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stock Transaction Dispute — No Perversity or Wednesbury Unreasonableness Found. The Court held that a new argument not raised before the arbitrator or in Section 34 proceedings cannot be raised for the first time in a Section 37 appeal.
15 Apr 2024The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by SATCO Capital Markets Ltd. against Rahul H Bajaj....
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Petition Challenging Deemed Conveyance Order in Favor of Cooperative Housing Society. Developer's Obligation to Transfer Land to Society Under Section 11 of Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act, 1963 is Absolute and Not Subject to Limitation.
5 Apr 2023The petitioners, K.V. Satyamurthy and S.M. Builders, were the owners and developers of a piece of land in Juhu, Mumbai. They constructed and sold 36 b...
- 39
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Applications for Recall of Interest Rate Reduction Order in Real Estate Dispute. Builders sought to restore interest rate reduction benefits granted to Amrapali Group, but court held contractual obligations cannot be unilaterally altered and relief was fact-specific to Amrapali's circumstances.
28 Feb 2023The Supreme Court considered a batch of interlocutory applications filed by various promoters, developers, and builders operating in Noida and Greater...
- 291
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Court Deposits by Former Employee Despite Appellant's CIRP — Section 14 IBC Moratorium Does Not Bar Withdrawal of Pre-CIRP Deposits Made by Corporate Debtor. The court held that the deposit made by the corporate debtor as a condition for stay of execution is not an asset of the corporate debtor and is not covered by the moratorium under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
4 Jan 2023The case involves an Interim Application filed by Rajendra Prasad Bansal (respondent in the First Appeal) seeking withdrawal of monies deposited by th...
- 36
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition Quashing Tahsildar's Order Levying Royalty on Excavated Material for Construction. Section 48 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 Does Not Empower Tahsildar to Levy Royalty on Material Excavated for Building Foundation or Plinth.
9 Dec 2021The petitioner, P.S.C. Pacific, a registered partnership firm, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order dated 11/8/2010...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Cancellation of Tender for Textile Mill Land Sale. Petitioner failed to demonstrate any legal right to compel conclusion of sale after tender was cancelled due to non-compliance with terms.
25 Jan 2021The petitioner, M/s Drushti Engineers & Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India ...
- 54
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds International Arbitral Award in Coal Supply Dispute — Damages Awarded for Breach of Contract. Division Bench of Delhi High Court Erred in Setting Aside Majority Award Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as Findings Were Plausible and Not Perverse.
17 Dec 2020The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal against a Division Bench judgment of the Delhi High Court that had set aside a majority international arbit...
- 184
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Seeks Resolution of Dispute Over Unauthorized Colony in Faridabad Through Arbitration and Committee Formation. The Court directs parties to submit responses on land extent, layout, and development charges to facilitate completion of the project.
3 Oct 2019The present dispute pertains to the claim of allottees who were not allotted plots on land owned by respondent No.6-Colonizer, Durga Builders Pvt. Ltd...
- 772
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Decision that Photocopying is Not a Works Contract Under Maharashtra Sales Tax on Works Contract Act. Activity of taking xerox copies does not involve transfer of property in goods, and the person carrying out such activity is not a 'dealer' under Section 2(1)(d) of the Maharashtra Sales Tax on Transfer of Property in Goods involved in Execution of Works Contract (Re-enacted) Act, 1989.
3 Mar 2006The case involves a Sales Tax Reference under Section 61 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959, at the instance of the Commissioner of Sales Tax, Maharash...
- 62
