Search Results for "arbitrator power"

919 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 919 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Government Contract Dispute Despite Non-Exhaustion of Pre-Arbitration Procedure. Party Autonomy and Minimal Judicial Intervention Upheld Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appellant, Hindustan Construction Company Ltd., was awarded a contract by the respondent, Bihar Rajya Pul Nirman Nigam Ltd. (BRPNNL), on 04.03.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restores Arbitral Award in Land Sale Dispute. Court Holds That Section 34 Petition Cannot Be Used to Reappreciate Evidence and That Award Was Not Perverse.

The case involves an arbitration appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging the judgment of the Principal Dist...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Dispute — CMD's Ineligibility to Act as Arbitrator Renders Appointment Void Ab Initio. Express Agreement in Writing Under Section 12(5) Proviso Must Be Post-Dispute and Cannot Be Inferred from Pre-Dispute Conduct.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by Bharat Broadband Network Limited (BBNL) against the judgment of the Delhi High Court, which had rejecte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Remove Arbitrator in Arbitration Dispute. Relationship Between Arbitrator and Law Firm Representing Party Does Not Automatically Disqualify Under Section 12(5) of Arbitration Act.

The petitioner, Sheetal Maruti Kurundwade, filed a petition under Section 9 and Sections 12(3) and 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Review Petition in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Court holds that review cannot be used as an appeal and that the arbitrator's appointment under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 is not subject to review on merits.

The petitioners, Roptonal Ltd (formerly Indian Film Company (Cyprus) Ltd) and Viacom 18 Media Pvt. Ltd., filed a review petition in the Bombay High Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Challenging Arbitral Award on Grounds of Patent Illegality and Public Policy. Court sets aside award for ignoring contractual terms and failing to consider counterclaims.

The judgment concerns two arbitration petitions arising out of the same arbitral award. The petitioners (original respondents) challenged the award un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petitions Challenging Arbitral Awards in Development Agreement Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on breach of contract and quantum of damages, rejecting grounds of patent illegality and public policy.

The petitioners, Pradyuman Kumar Sharma and Kuber Planters Limited, filed four arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliat...