Search Results for "adulteration"

150 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 150 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Directors' Plea to Quash Food Adulteration Case. Delay in Filing Complaint and Loss of Right to Sample Reanalysis Does Not Invalidate Prosecution.

  Sections Discussed: Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954: Sections 2(ia), 2(ia)(m), 7(1), 13(2), 16, and 17 Code of Criminal Procedure ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Rules. Conviction for selling adulterated 'Rava' set aside as Food Inspector failed to follow Rules 14, 16, and 22 of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Nanakram Govardhandas Chandkai and M/s. Gurunanak Supari Bhandar (the applicants/accused) a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules. Acquittal of Vendor for Selling Adulterated Groundnut Oil Upheld as Sample Not Representative and Rules 14 and 16 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Not Followed.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Bramhapuri, in Regular Criminal Case No.68 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Sampling of Ice Candy Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment of the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Dahiwadi, acquitting Bharat Anant Shinde of offences un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Procedural Lapses. Non-Compliance with Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Proper Mixing and Division of Sample Leads to Acquittal of Vendor and Proprietor.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 30th April 2001 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Solapur in Regular Cri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Case Against Directors and Company in Food Adulteration Matter Due to Lack of Vicarious Liability. Failure to Show That Accused Were In Charge of and Responsible for Business Conduct at Time of Offence Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The applicants, who were directors and a company (Marico Industries Ltd.), filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Service of Analyst Report. Failure to Serve Copy of Public Analyst Report on Accused Violates Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Resulting in Denial of Right to Request Re-analysis.

The case involves an appeal by the State of Maharashtra against the acquittal of the respondent-accused, Atul Taksande, proprietor of M/s Atul Provisi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Discrepancy Between Analyst Reports and Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules. Acquittal of Accused Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Adulteration Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Food Inspector, appealed against the judgment and order dated 11/10/2000 passed by the 6th Judicial Magistrate F...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sampling Procedure. Failure to Follow Rule 14 of Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955 Regarding Proper Mixing and Sampling Renders Prosecution Unsustainable.

The State of Maharashtra, through Food Inspector S.G. Dharme, filed an appeal against the judgment and order dated 10/05/2000 passed by the 6th Judici...